FaceBook
YouTube

Fukushima

Gorakhpur Nuclear Power Plant: A Flawed Proposal

Author / Source / Date: 

Newsclick Production, April 6, 2013

D. Raghunandan.jpeg

Newsclick discusses with D Raghunandan the repurcussions of the proposed Nuclear Power Plant at Gorakhpur in Haryana. There are many problems with this proposed plant, specially relating to siting and sources of water. The only possible source of water for the NPP is the Bhakra canal. Apart from this, the site has a high density of population around. Raghunandan feels there is a political commitment to go ahead with nuclear technology, regardless of costs. He says all sources of energy should be evaluated dispassionately, clearly taking into account the costs, risks, potential benefits, and then the more suitable one should be opted. He thinks such an analysis would put nuclear energy at the bottom of this.

Stuxnet and now Flame: The US and Israel Continuing Cyber War against Iran

Author / Source / Date: 

Prabir Purkayastha, Newsclick, June 12, 2012

cyber.jpeg

Last two weeks have brought out that cyber

One Year since Fukushima - A Nuclear Chill

Author / Source / Date: 

Newsclick Production

prabirnuclear.jpg

Prabir Purkayastha of the Delhi Science Forum comments on state of nuclear energy today, a year after the Fukushima Nuclear Accident following a massive earthquake and tsunami in Japan. He explains these in the context of protests against nuclear plants in India today.

Fukushima and the Chilling of Nuclear Power

Author / Source / Date: 

Prabir Purkayastha, Newsclick, March 14, 2012

fukushima4.png
It is now one year since the Fukushima disaster took place that saw 3 reactors in TEPCO's Dai-ichi nuclear plant suffering core melt-downs and explosions. On 11th March 2011, an earthquake of 9.0 on Richter scale took place 130 kilometres off the coast of Japan. Within an hour, a tsunami of unprecedented magnitude struck Japan, the tidal wave of water and mud cutting a huge swath of death and destruction through the coastal areas of Japan.
 

Nuclear Liability Regime in India

Author / Source / Date: 

Newsclick Production, Dec. 12, 2011

prabir_dsf.png
In this video, Newclick discusses the liability regime put in place in India to deal with the aftermath of a nuclear incident. Despite recent reports extolling the virtues of India's foreign policy in having succesfully stood up to US demands to further weaken our liability regime, the recently notified Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Rules, 2011, appear to derogate substantially from the (already limited) safeguards put in place by the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act, 2010. Prabir Purkayastha highlights the various shortcomings of the Rules (ranging from severely limiting the right to recourse to introducing a new and uber-paternalistic model of compensation adjudication), as also the logic behind having limited liability in particular in view of the recent Fukushima disaster and protests regarding the Kudankulam nuclear plant in Tamil Nadu.

Nuclear Liability Act and its Rules: The Tail Wagging the Dog

Author / Source / Date: 

Prabir Purkayastha, Newsclick, Nov. 23, 2011

radioactive.jpeg
The Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Rules notified on November 11, 2011 does what the US Government has been demanding of India – completely dilute the liability of the nuclear suppliers. This is in complete violation of all basic jurisprudence. No rule can override the basic act itself: this is precisely what these Rules are doing.
 

The Kudankulam stand-off: A way out

Author / Source / Date: 

Dr A Gopalakrishnan, Daily News & Analysis, Nov. 09, 2011

nuclear_kudankulam.jpeg

Protests against the two Russian VVER nuclear reactors being built in Kudankulam were low key all along, but after the Fukushima accident, this opposition has gained momentum.

Kudankulam Nuclear Reactors- Protests persist as government suffers from credibility crisis

Author / Source / Date: 

Newsclick Production, 13-Oct-2011

Screen shot 2011-10-15 at 2.23.43 PM.png

D. Raghunandan of the All India Peoples' Science Network argues for an independent review of nuclear safety measures and audit said to be concluded by the Atomic Energy establishment of the Indian government. Protestors in Kudankulam and elsewhere are unwilling to trust the government's claims of safety of the nuclear reactors, because there is a large credibility gap. This can only be breached if an effort is made to bestow autonomy to the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board and safety concerns after the Fukushima incident over nuclear energy are sufficiently allayed through independent review of the existing programme.

Fukushima – The Crisis Continues

Author / Source / Date: 

Prabir Purkayastha, Newsclick, May 25, 2011

fukushima4.png
Tepco has now admitted what has been said by independent experts for quite some time.

Fukushima ranked INES level 7: Same as Chernobyl

Author / Source / Date: 

Newsclick Productions, April 16, 2011

Styajit rath.JPG

Dr. Satyajit Rath , National Institute of Immunology, talks to Newsclick about events unfolding in Fukushima.

Syndicate content