NewsClick

NewsClick
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Covid-19
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • International
  • Sports
  • Articles
  • Videos
search
menu

INTERACTIVE ELECTION MAPS

image/svg+xml
  • All Articles
  • Newsclick Articles
  • All Videos
  • Newsclick Videos
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • Sports
  • International
  • Africa
  • Latin America
  • Palestine
  • Nepal
  • Pakistan
  • Sri Lanka
  • US
  • West Asia
About us
Subscribe
Follow us Facebook - Newsclick Twitter - Newsclick RSS - Newsclick
close menu
×
For latest updates on nCOVID-19 around the world visit our INTERACTIVE COVID MAP
Politics
India

Dr Ambedkar’s Constitution and CAB

On his death anniversary, let us remember what Dr. Ambedkar and the founders of the Constitution had to say about secularism, citizenship and the right to equality.
Subodh Varma
06 Dec 2019
Dr Ambedkar’s Constitution and CAB

It is a strange twist of irony that on Dr. Ambedkar’s 63rd death anniversary, the country is embroiled in one of the clearest cases of changing a basic tenet of Constitution. The Bharatiya Janata Party-led central government has placed an amendment bill in the Lok Sabha which will change certain provisions of law for giving citizenship to illegal immigrants into the country. This bill is called the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill, 2019 (CAB) and it amends certain provisions of the Citizenship Act, 1955.

A careful analysis of what the CAB does will show that it militates against some of the core values that Dr. Ambedkar stood for and fought for.

The CAB says that all illegal immigrants except Muslims from three of India’s neighbouring countries (Afghanistan, Pakistan and Bangladesh) will not be considered illegal and will be naturalised as citizens in a much shorter time frame than provided for others. How does this go against the very spirit of the Constitution and the values of Dr. Ambedkar?

Attack on Secularism

The Indian Constitution declares that India is a secular country. This is generally interpreted to mean that the government does not discriminate against any religion nor does it favour any particular religion. Clearly, the CAB violates this core or basic principle. It will actively discriminate against Muslims coming from the designated three countries (which are Muslim majority countries). They will be imprisoned, deported or asked to prove their credentials for naturalisation which includes proof that they have stayed in India for 11 of the last 14 years.

Also read: What is the Real Intention Behind CAB and the Future Pan-Indian NRC?

Besides this, there is another aspect of discrimination. The argument being given in favour of this is that non-Muslims are persecuted in these three countries and hence, they will be given shelter in India. But what about other Muslim sects like the Ahmediyas who also face persecution in some of these countries? Under the new law, they will be dealt with in the same way as all Muslims. In other words, it is not about persecution but about religious belief.

Here, it is necessary to clear the air about some fake news that the Sangh Parivar has been propagating assiduously. According to this, Dr. Ambedkar was opposed to secularism and that is why he rejected the proposed amendment to the Constitution that called for characterising India as a ‘secular’ country.

Actually, on November 15, 1948, Prof. K. T. Shah had proposed in the Constituent Assembly that the words “Secular, Federal, Socialist” be inserted in Article 1 of the Constitution. Dr. Ambedkar rejected the proposed amendment (as did the Constituent Assembly). In his argument, he only gave reasons to why adding “Socialist” is superfluous and enunciated the principle that such matters as the economic system to be developed are best left to Parliament. He made no comments on secularism. This has been distorted to imply that he was against secularism.

Moreover, other interventions in the debate on the Constitution make it amply clear that Dr. Ambedkar firmly stood by the principle that religion is a private matter and that it should not impinge upon public policy. For example, on the question of government’s financial support to such educational institutions that imparted religious education, he remained firmly opposed, saying, “We have accepted the proposition which is embodied in Article 21, that public funds raised by taxes shall not be utilised for the benefit of any particular community.” He, in fact, went on to say, “Unfortunately, the religions which prevail in this country are not merely non-social; so far as their mutual relations are concerned, they are anti-social, one religion claiming that its teachings constitute the only right path for salvation, that all other religions are wrong. ….. In view of this, it seems to me that we should be considerably disturbing the peaceful atmosphere of an institution if these controversies with regard to the truthful character of any particular religion and the erroneous character of the other were brought into juxtaposition in the school itself.”

Also read: Citizenship Bill -- A Thoughtless, Dangerous Business

The canard that is opportunistically spread by the Sangh Parivar about Dr. Ambedkar being opposed to secularism has been used to mislead many people but it is just another one of those lies that are so common today.

Attack on Equality

The CAB is also an attack on one of the fundamental rights, as enshrined in Article 14. This Article reads as under:

14. Equality before law. - The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India.

It is included in Part III of the Constitution, entitled “Fundamental Rights”.

What this means is that not only will the State ensure equality through its actions for “any person” within the territory of India, but, it will also ensure that all such persons get the equal protection of law. Note that the Article is specifying “any person” and not citizens. This means that even foreigners or illegal immigrants will be guaranteed the right, which is a profound and fundamental vision.

But the CAB does precisely the opposite – it discriminates against illegal immigrants of one religious persuasion. In this sense, it is violative of a fundamental right.

Does the government have a right to amend such rights? Some may be misled into thinking that after all, can’t the government amend the Constitution?

The answer has been more or less provided by various Supreme Court judgements on what can be amended and what cannot be changed. Of these, the Keshavananda Bharti case is the seminal one, which laid down that the basic structure of the Constitution cannot be changed and also that Fundamental Rights are part of the Basic Structure. Other subsequent judgements, too, have reiterated that Fundamental Rights are part of the Constitution. In short, it can be very robustly argued that CAB is an attempt to change the basic structure of the Constitution and hence, liable to be struck down by the Supreme Court.

Also read: In My Own Voice: Citizenship Amendment Bill and You

Finally, it should be remembered that the present government has been systematically destroying various features of the Constitution – federalism, democracy, rule of law, rights of individuals, rights of oppressed classes especially dalits and adivasis, etc. CAB is yet another attack. On Dr. Ambedkar’s death anniversary, it is necessary to remember this and to fight against this destruction of his legacy.

Get the latest reports & analysis with people's perspective on Protests, movements & deep analytical videos, discussions of the current affairs in your Telegram app. Subscribe to NewsClick's Telegram channel & get Real-Time updates on stories, as they get published on our website.
Citizenship Amendment Bill 2019
constitution
Attack on Constitution
Attack on Fundamental Rights
Modi government
Attack on Constitution under Modi Government
Dr B R Ambedkar
Constituent Assembly
secularism
Immigrants Rights
Related Stories
Farmers Begin March to Mumbai to Participate in Mahapadav Against Farm Laws

Farmers Begin March to Mumbai to Participate in Mahapadav Against Farm Laws

General Strike, Nov 2020

‘Meeting was Farce’: Central Trade Unions Ask Govt to Put Labour Codes on Hold, Start Fresh Discussions

mahendar tikait.

Protesting Farmers Remember Mahendra Singh Tikait and Historic Boat Club Agitation

Women Storm Raj Bhawan in Chennai on Mahila Kisan Diwas

Women Storm Raj Bhawan in Chennai on Mahila Kisan Diwas

mahila kisan diwas.

Farmers Observe ‘Mahila Kisan Diwas’, Women Protesters Say Real Nari Shakti at Display

2 Months On, 60 Lives Lost, 9 Rounds of Talks: Protesting Farmers are a Picture of Hope

2 Months On, 60 Lives Lost, 9 Rounds of Talks: Protesting Farmers are a Picture of Hope

farmers protest

Enough is Enough’, Akola Farmers’ Message to PM Modi

judiciary.

An Affront to Judicial Majesty that Confuses the People too

cash relifien pandemic.

Why Modi Govt Looked the Other Way on Giving Cash Relief During Pandemic

farmers protest.

Farmers’ Agitation: A Catch-22 Situation for Prime Minister Modi

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share

Related Stories

Sruti MD

Women Storm Raj Bhawan in Chennai on Mahila Kisan Diwas

19 January 2021
On Mahila Kisan Diwas - January 18 - Chennai witnessed a fiery protest demonstration solely by women.
Tarique Anwar

Farmers Observe ‘Mahila Kisan Diwas’, Women Protesters Say Real Nari Shakti at Display

19 January 2021
New Delhi: Aiming to acknowledge and honour the incredible contribution of women in agricultural activities and the household, and active participa
Tarique Anwar

2 Months On, 60 Lives Lost, 9 Rounds of Talks: Protesting Farmers are a Picture of Hope

15 January 2021
New Delhi: Despite several weeks of acrimonious interaction with the Central government, farmers agitating against the three conte

Pagination

  • Previous page ‹‹
  • Next page ››

More

  • Centre asks states to take all measures required under Transgender Act, 2019; tells them to constitute Transgender Protection Cell

    Centre Asks States to Take All Measures Required Under Transgender Act, 2019; Tells Them to Constitute Transgender Protection Cell

  • farmers march delhi 26th.

    ‘I Have Never Seen a Tractor Parade Like This. This is New India for me.’

  • gujarat farmers.

    More Than 600 Farmers From Gujarat with 100 Tractors Join Delhi Protest Rally

  • Lakhs of Farmers Waiting at Delhi Borders

    Live Blog: Lakhs of Farmers Waiting at Delhi Borders, Govt. Scrambling for Control

  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with
about