The Supreme Court verdict on September 15 in the Sudarshan TV case may have protected the Constitution but it is not expected to affect the attitude of news channels and their habit of serving hate in the name of content.
The Supreme Court verdict on September 15 in the Sudarshan TV case may have protected the Constitution but it is not expected to affect the attitude of news channels and their habit of serving hate in the name of content. Why have the news channels turned out like this? Are its roots in business or politics? Why has self regulation failed, is the Media Council proposed by the parliamentary committee in 2013 a better option for this? Senior journalist Urmilesh analyses.