NewsClick

NewsClick
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Covid-19
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • International
  • Sports
  • Articles
  • Videos
search
menu

INTERACTIVE ELECTION MAPS

image/svg+xml
  • All Articles
  • Newsclick Articles
  • All Videos
  • Newsclick Videos
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • Sports
  • International
  • Africa
  • Latin America
  • Palestine
  • Nepal
  • Pakistan
  • Sri Lanka
  • US
  • West Asia
About us
Subscribe
Follow us Facebook - Newsclick Twitter - Newsclick RSS - Newsclick
close menu
×
For latest updates on nCOVID-19 around the world visit our INTERACTIVE COVID MAP
Politics
International
US

Trump, the Deal Maker, Blinks Before China

But, Beijing has concluded that an equal relationship with US is just not possible. In the final analysis, the geopolitical consequences of the trade war will be far-reaching.
M.K. Bhadrakumar
17 Jan 2020
US and China

US President Donald Trump and Chinese Vice Premier Liu He, sign the China-US phase-one economic and trade agreement in a ceremony at the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, January 15, 2020.

The signing ceremony of the China-US phase-one economic and trade agreement at the East Room of the White House in Washington on Jan. 15, 2020 turned out to be a unique event. Historically, the East Room witnessed many important signing ceremonies. Notably, the signing of  the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty was in the East Room on December 8, 1987 by US President Ronald Reagan and the Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev; the East Room was also the venue when President George H. W. Bush and Gorbachev signed five treaties on June 2, 1990, including  the 1990 Chemical Weapons Accord.

This must be the first time that the East Room witnessed an agreement being signed by the US President and foreign dignitary who is way down in protocol. Last December, United States Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer had said that “representatives from both countries” would sign the Phase 1 trade deal agreement in the first week of January. But, evidently, President Trump insisted on signing the agreement himself, although Chinese President Xi Jinping stayed back in Beijing, preparing for a historic visit to Myanmar to “write a new chapter” in the two countries’ “millennia-old pauk-phaw friendship”. 

Wednesday’s  photo-op in the East Room tells a story by itself. It underscores how terribly important this trade deal has become politically for Trump, as he makes his bid for a second term in the November election. 

However, the main assumption behind launching the trade war on June 15, 2018 turns out to be a bombastic notion — that the US would crush the Chinese economy. China has proven right in its reaction that both countries stood to lose and the tariff war was a road to nowhere. 

In the event, after 30-month old war, the US Federal Reserve estimates that China’s economy has taken a 0.25% hit, which is no doubt significant but not lethal, as US demand for its goods fell by about a third. But on the other hand, the US Congressional Budget Office estimates that tariff-related uncertainty and costs have shaved 0.3% off of US economic growth, and also reduced household income in America by an average of $580 since 2018. 

Suffice to say, the new deal halves tariff rates on $120bn worth of goods, but most of the higher duties — which affect another $360bn of Chinese goods and more than $100bn worth of US exports — remain in place. And that can only be bad news for the American public.

Economists have estimated that the costs of the trade war — more than $40bn so far — are being borne entirely by the US companies and consumers. Indeed, this excludes lost business for US exporters due to Chinese retaliation. 

Through the tortuous negotiations for the new trade deal, China largely stuck to the terms it had offered right at the outset. The new deal envisages that China will boost purchases in manufacturing, services, agriculture and energy from 2017 levels by $200bn over two years.

What matters most to Trump is that that China could step up purchase of agricultural exports. Trump mentioned a figure of $50bn worth of imports of agricultural goods a year by China. But China has added the caveat that the purchases will depend on market demand. 

Clearly, it was the Chinese retaliation by terminating agricultural imports from US that really hurt Trump politically, who won the White House in 2016 with strong backing from farming states. The US exported nearly $20bn worth of agricultural products to China in 2017. That figure fell to $9.1bn last year, after China imposed retaliatory tariffs of up to 25% on a range of US goods, including apples, soybeans, ginseng and cotton. 

Farm bankruptcies have surged 24% across America since September 2018, a few months after US trade disputes with China led to higher tariffs on key farm goods including soyabeans, cotton and dairy. This has forced Trump to announce some $28bn in aid for farmers affected by the tariffs, leading to a ridiculous situation where 40% of farm profits this year are expected to come from federal assistance. 

The protections for intellectual property was supposedly one main reason that triggered the trade war. The new deal is based on some commitments that China has made, but are they any different from its earlier promises? Equally, the new deal fails to address the issue of subsidies Beijing provides to certain industries. 

Overall, it is possible to estimate that this is more a ceasefire rather than a peace agreement. And this realisation could well be the reason why Xi Jinping gave the slip to the signing ceremony. This ceasefire would hold through the year 2020 but what happens thereafter is hard to foresee. The bottom line is that the US exports have lost their competitiveness vis-a-vis China.

The main gain for Trump is the optics of the new deal, which enables him to put the trade war behind him and claim an achievement during the upcoming election campaign.

Having said that it is hard to underestimate the collateral damage caused by the trade war to the US-China relationship. The climate has become toxic as the Trump administration resorted to “maximum pressure” approach when it transpired that China was refusing to blink. 

The assault on the reputation of the Chinese Communist Party headed by Xi, the US interference in Hong Kong and the situation in Xinjiang, and the cold-war style rhetoric by top US officials — in particular, at the level of the Vice-President Mike Pence and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo — crossed the red lines. 

Trust, once broken, cannot be restored easily. And, to cap it, Chinese national pride and self-esteem have been wounded. Beijing has concluded that an equal relationship with the US is just not possible. China cannot and will not accept US hegemony. In the final analysis, therefore, the geopolitical consequences of the trade war are going to be far-reaching.

Get the latest reports & analysis with people's perspective on Protests, movements & deep analytical videos, discussions of the current affairs in your Telegram app. Subscribe to NewsClick's Telegram channel & get Real-Time updates on stories, as they get published on our website.
US-China
Donald Trump
Xi Jinping
Mike Pence
Mike Pompeo
China's economy
Related Stories
modi and trump

Why Hindutva Supporters Find Trump’s Defeat Hard to Accept

Mike Pompeo

China Slaps Sanctions Against Mike Pompeo, 27 Key Trump Officials

An anti-Bannon placard at a pro-immigrant rights protest in Boston in 2017. Photo: Ban Bannon by Pierce on Flickr. This photo is available under a CC BY 2.0 licence

Steve Bannon and Corrupt Officials Given Last-Minute Pardon by Trump

Biden Signs Executive Order Rejoining Paris Climate Agreement, to Come Into Effect February 19

Biden Signs Executive Order Rejoining Paris Climate Agreement, to Come Into Effect February 19

Will the Dems Sell us Out in the Midst of a Pandemic?

Trump’s Second Impeachment Shows the World the Power That Corporations Have Over American Politics

Joe Biden

Joe Biden to Swear in as US President Amid Heavy Security, Trump’s Farewell May be Damp

Guatemalan security forces repressed thousands of Honduran migrants with tear gas and stun grenades on January 17, in the town of Vado Hondo, in the department of Chiquimula, bordering Honduras. Photo: Prensa Libre

Guatemalan Security Forces Repress Honduran Migrant Caravan Heading Towards the US

Russian opposition activist Alexei Navalny was detained at the airport in Moscow upon arrival from Germany, January 17, 2021

US Makes Aggressive First Move on Russian Chessboard

US Capitol Hill riot

US Capitol Rioters Included Highly Trained Ex-Military and Cops

US House Impeaches Trump for 'Incitement of Insurrection' at Capitol

US House Impeaches Trump for 'Incitement of Insurrection' at Capitol

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share

Related Stories

M.K. Bhadrakumar

Biden’s Idea of India and Savarkar’s is Poles Apart

23 January 2021
According to media repor
Noam Chomsky, Vijay Prashad

Why Neoliberal Leaders Who Failed to Protect Their Countries From COVID-19 Must Be Investigated

23 January 2021
Warnings that the oxygen supply was running out in the city of Manaus, Brazil, came to local and federa
Yanis Iqbal

USA’s Game Plan in Venezuela: Strangulation through Sanctions

21 January 2021
On 19 January, 2021, the US Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated three individuals, fourteen entit

Pagination

  • Next page ››

More

  • ‘Drop Arrest Warrant against Paranjoy Guha Thakurta’: Demands Committee to Protect Journalists

    ‘Drop Arrest Warrant against Paranjoy Guha Thakurta’: Demands Committee to Protect Journalists

  • West Bengal: 3-day-long Farmers’ Dharna in Kolkata Concludes with Resolve to Continue Protesting Until All Demands Are Met

    West Bengal: 3-day-long Farmers’ Dharna in Kolkata Concludes with Resolve to Continue Protesting Until All Demands Are Met

  • donald Trump

    Trump Impeachment Trial in US Senate to Begin on Feb 8

  • Delhi Violence: Media Shouldn’t Destroy ‘Presumption of Innocence’ of Undertrial, Says Court

    Delhi Violence: Media Shouldn’t Destroy ‘Presumption of Innocence’ of Undertrial, Says Court

  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with
about