NewsClick

NewsClick
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Covid-19
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • International
  • Sports
  • Articles
  • Videos
search
menu

INTERACTIVE ELECTION MAPS

image/svg+xml
  • All Articles
  • Newsclick Articles
  • All Videos
  • Newsclick Videos
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • Sports
  • International
  • Africa
  • Latin America
  • Palestine
  • Nepal
  • Pakistan
  • Sri Lanka
  • US
  • West Asia
About us
Subscribe
Follow us Facebook - Newsclick Twitter - Newsclick RSS - Newsclick
close menu
×
For latest updates on nCOVID-19 around the world visit our INTERACTIVE COVID MAP
Politics
India

Delhi Riots: Police Spin Conspiracy Theory, Accuse Anti-CAA Protesters of Planning ‘Blast’ Ahead of Trump’s Visit

Police claims a meeting was organised on January 8. In fact, the first report about Trump’s possible visit came out on January 14. So, the claim that a “blast” was planned prior to that rings hollow.
Tarique Anwar
13 Jun 2020
Police Spins Conspiracy Theory, Accuses Anti-CAA Protesters

File Photo.

New Delhi:Levelling a bizarre allegation, the Delhi Police has claimed that anti-CAA (Citizenship Amendment Act) protesters held a meeting to trigger a “big blast” ahead of US President Donald Trump’s visit to India even when there was no information whatsoever about the possibility of such a visit in public domain.

The basis for Delhi Police’s conspiracy theory surrounding the communal violence in Northeast Delhi in February this year is an alleged meeting wherein a “big blast” was planned during the visit of United States President Donald Trump. The “meeting” of suspended Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) councillor Tahir Hussain, former Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) student Umar Khalid and activist Khalid Saifi — according to investigators — took place on January 8 at Shaheen Bagh in Southeast Delhi.

The alleged meeting has found a mention in two charge-sheets filed under FIR No. 65/2020 (registered at Dayalpur police station) and FIR No. 101/2020 (registered at Khajuri Khas police station) — both related to the violence in Chand Bagh area of Northeast Delhi. While the first FIR is related to the murder of Intelligence Bureau (IB) staffer Ankit Sharma, the second is related to the violence at Chand Bagh. Tahir is an accused in both the cases.

ALSO READ:Police’s Charge-sheet Gives Chronology of Delhi Riots, Omits Kapil Mishra’s Crucial ‘Hate Speech’

“...the riots took place in a planned manner resulted from a well hatched conspiracy. During investigation, it was also revealed that the accused Tahir Hussain was in touch with Khalid Saifi who is connected with Unite Against Hate Group. Tahir Hussain was also connected to Umar Khalid through Khalid Saifi. Khalid Saifi had arranged Tahir’s meeting with Umar Khalid on 08.01.2020 (January 8, 2020) at Saheen Bagh. In that meeting, it was decided to have a big blast so that the Central Govt. could be shaken on the issue of CAA/NRC and so as to defame the country in the international arena. In the meeting, Umar Khalid had assured not to bother about the fund as PFI (Popular Front of India) organization would also be ready to provide fund and logistics for these riots. These riots were planned to be happened during or prior to the visit of US President Donald Trump in the month of February, 2020… (sic),” claimed the Delhi Police’s Crime Branch in the charge-sheet submitted before Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM) Pawan Singh Rajawat at Karkardooma Court in North-East Delhi.

GLARING LOOPHOLES

It is strange to note that the conspiracy to carry out the “big blast” was “well-hatched” six days before the first news of Trump’s possible visit to India. The first report about this possible visit came only on January 14. So, the claim that such a “blast” was planned even prior to that rings hollow.

NewsClick went through the charge-sheets, news reports and government’s press releases to understand if there is any truth to the implication that Tahir, Khalid and Umar knew about the US President’s visit on January 8 itself.

According to the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke to Trump on January 7 to convey New Year greetings, but the ministry’s press release does not have any mention of the US President’s visit to India.

There was no information with regard to Trump’s possible visit till January 13. On January 14,The Hindu and Hindustan Times published a source-based report, stating that Trump would be visiting India at the end or second half of February.

ALSO READ:Delhi Riots: Provocation by Anti-CAA Protesters Triggered ‘Retaliation’, Allege Chargesheets

This was followed by several other news reports. But the official announcement came only on February 11 when the Prime Minister’s Office through a press statement confirmed that Donald Trump and his wife Melania Trump would be on their first state visit to India from February 24 to 25, 2020.

It further stated that he would attend official engagements in New Delhi and Ahmedabad (Gujarat) and interact with a wide cross-section of Indian society.

NewsClick accessed and searched the government's press statements from December 2019 till January 8 to find out if there was any information on the possibility of this visit before January 8 in the public domain, but there was none. In this context, the police’s allegations—which imply that the trio was privy to the US president’s visit much earlier—come into question.

Even if such a “meeting” indeed took place, the police charge-sheet does not clarify how the investigators found out the details of the purported discussion. One could argue that these details were revealed during the interrogation of the arrested accused, but strangely, the charge-sheet fails to mention the basis for these grave allegations.

ALSO READ:Court Raps Cops, Says Delhi Violence Investigation Directed ‘Towards One End’

Instead, the police vaguely claim that it was revealed during “investigations” and conclude by saying that “a separate case vide FIR No. 59/2020 dated 06.03.2020 (March 6, 2020) for the conspiracy to these riots has been registered by Special Cell and is under investigation”.

There is no official explanation on this glaring loophole in the “investigation”. The Crime Branch sources say the “meeting” was organised on January 8 and it is the Special Cell of the Delhi Police, which is probing into the conspiracy of the Delhi riots, which can give details in this regard.

No official of the Special Cell could be reached for comments.

Also read:Delhi Police Threatened Legal Action for Protesting Against Arrests, Allege DU Student Activists

Get the latest reports & analysis with people's perspective on Protests, movements & deep analytical videos, discussions of the current affairs in your Telegram app. Subscribe to NewsClick's Telegram channel & get Real-Time updates on stories, as they get published on our website.
Delhi riot
CAA
Anti-CAA protest
Shaheen Bagh
Northeast Delhi
Delhi Police
Umar Khalid
Tahir Hussain
Khalid Saifi
Related Stories
SC

Will Supreme Court Apply Rohingya Case Logic to CAA?

Delhi riots

Delhi violence: Court grants stay in trial of case where complainant is also accused

delhi riots

Delhi Riots Accused Granted Bail After Court Doubts Credibility of Police Witnesses

Assam NRC.

NRC Officials Awaiting SC Order Before Issuing Rejection Slips

Delhi Riots: Son Languishing in Jail for Over a Year, Mother Forced to Beg for Survival

Delhi Riots: Son Languishing in Jail for Over a Year, Mother Forced to Beg for Survival

Guhati high Court.

Gauhati HC Restores Indian Citizenship of a Woman Declared a Foreigner in 2017

CCA NRC WB Election

West Bengal Election: CAA, NRC and Manifestos of Major Parties

Delhi Riots

Delhi Riots: Bail Orders Narrate a Saga of ‘Doubtful’ Witnesses, ‘Concocted’ Evidence

BJP’s Religious Polarisation: A Distant Dream in Tamil Nadu

BJP’s Religious Polarisation: A Distant Dream in Tamil Nadu

Delhi Riots

Delhi Riots: A Year Later, No Breakthrough in Six Murder Cases

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share

Related Stories

Dipanjan Sinha

What a BJP Victory Would Mean for Bengal – a Step Closer to Hindu Rashtra

19 April 2021
In this exclusive interview, Prof Partha Chatterjee, political scientist, former Director, Centre for Studies in Social Studies, Calcutta, and
Rabindra Nath Sinha

West Bengal Polls: In the Hills, Compulsions Dictate Local Outfits’ Decisions

15 April 2021
Kolkata, April 14: Political outfits in the Darjeeling Hills – which include
Sabrang India

Gauhati HC Overturns FT Order, Declares Man to be Indian Citizen

13 April 2021
The Gauhati High Court has set aside an order passed by Foreigners Tribunal Barpeta, declaring a person as a foreigner, while observing the many fl

Pagination

  • Next page ››

More

  • Understanding CJI-designate, Justice NV Ramana

    Understanding CJI-Designate, Justice NV Ramana

  • SC Wants Centre to Draw ‘National Plan’ on COVID-19 Crisis, Including on Oxygen Supply

    SC Wants Centre to Draw ‘National Plan’ on COVID-19 Crisis, Including on Oxygen Supply

  • Over 300 Passengers Flee Silchar Airport to Avoid Mandatory COVID Testing

    Over 300 Passengers Flee Silchar Airport to Avoid Mandatory COVID Testing

  • Health ministry instructions to reduce oxygen supply to Maharashtra unfortunate, says Bombay HC Nagpur bench; directs PRAX Air-Bhilai to continue with 110MT supply

    Health Ministry Instructions to Reduce Oxygen Supply to Maharashtra Unfortunate, says Bombay HC Nagpur Bench; Directs PRAX Air-Bhilai to Continue With 110MT Supply

  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with
about