NewsClick

NewsClick
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • International
  • Sports
  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Videos
search
menu
  • All Podcasts
  • All Articles
  • Newsclick Articles
  • All Videos
  • Newsclick Videos
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • Sports
  • International
  • Africa
  • Latin America
  • Palestine
  • Nepal
  • Pakistan
  • Sri Lanka
  • US
  • West Asia
About us
Contact us
Subscribe
Follow us Facebook - Newsclick Twitter - Newsclick RSS - Newsclick
close menu
Politics
International

Only the Coalition of Foolish Wants a War with Iran

No one on the planet wants a war. Hence, there is need to check the most reckless powers in our world today -- Israel, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and the US.
Vijay Prashad
17 Sep 2019
Trump Iran

There’s no point in dredging up that old slogan, ‘No Blood for Oil’. It had no impact the last time. Don’t bomb Iraq, we said in 2002 and 2003, to no avail. George W. Bush and his friends had it in mind to destroy that country, which they did. 

Donald Trump fired John Bolton. It seemed as if it would be acceptable to breathe a sigh of relief. But that was premature. Bolton was not the only one itching for a war against Iran. So was Mike Pompeo of the State Department, and so are a legion of arms dealers, lobbyists, establishment hawks, and people who believe that the United States should bomb Iran on behalf of Israel and Saudi Arabia.

Yemen’s Houthis took credit for the attack on Saudi Arabia’s eastern oilfields. But that was not enough. It was not enough that the Iraqis said that Iran did not use Iraqi territory to launch the drones. The US asserted that the attack was done by Iran. No more needed to be said. There was no need to drag someone like Colin Powell before the UN Security Council. In fact, there is no one like Colin Powell in the Trump administration. None of his Cabinet members has the kind of gravitas that can be squandered with a lie.

The reaction from Iran has been calm. The government in Tehran has decided not to cower beneath the storm clouds from Washington. It threatens Canada with its own sanctions if the Canadians do not release seized Iranian assets. An oil tanker that was carrying diesel to the United Arab Emirates has been seized by the Iranians on the grounds of smuggling. Iran’s President Hassan Rouhani told the Syria Summit in Ankara, Turkey, that there can be no stability in Syria as long as US troops remain there. Iran refuses to blink. It has taken the position that it must stand strong and call the US.bluff.

This is a dangerous bluff. But it is also a calculated one.

Trade, Not Bombs

The Iranians know that there is no appetite in Europe for a US war or even a US military strike. This week, Michael Bock, the chair of the Instrument for Supporting Trade Exchanges (INSTEX), is in Tehran. INSTEX is the mechanism created by the European Union to sidestep the US unilateral sanctions. Bock has met with the governor of the Central Bank of Iran and the head of SATMA—the Iranian institution created to facilitate INSTEX. The Europeans are eager to restart trade with Iran. They are not interested in Trump’s froth.

Nor are the Turks, whose senior banking officials have met with the Iranians to discuss how to re-establish trade outside the US orbit. Turkey is interested in its own version of INSTEX and is calibrating what it would mean for Turkey and Iran to trade using their own currencies (in the rial or the lira). Both countries have said that they would like to increase trade to $30 billion—three times the highest trade volume.

Even the British, embroiled in their Brexit mess, are not eager for war. UK Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab said “the picture is not entirely clear” as to who bombed the Saudi oil fields. He sounded like the Russians (no “hasty conclusions,” said Dmitry Peskov) and the Chinese (not easy to “apportion blame,” said Hua  Chunying).

Russia and China

From the perspective of Russia and China, a US bombardment of Iran would undermine their economic projects in Eurasia. There is fear in Moscow and Beijing that such an American adventure would rip apart whatever small measure of stability has been achieved from the Mediterranean Sea to the Hindu Kush mountains. The failed US peace talks in Afghanistan leave that country now open to the initiatives from regional powers, including China and Russia.

One little-known aspect of the US-Taliban talks over Afghanistan has been the role of China. In June and July, both Abdul Ghani Baradar—the Taliban’s chief negotiator—and Zalmay Khalilzad—the US negotiator—came to Beijing at different times. China played a key role in urging Pakistan to pressure the Taliban in these talks. Even as the US has stepped away, China will continue to build relations with various factions in Afghanistan. This is essential for the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor and the Trans-Himalayan Economic Corridor, which draw the Belt and Road Initiative southward into Pakistan and Nepal.

A US war against Iran would upend the already terrible security situation in Afghanistan, and it would tear apart Syria and Iraq, as well as Lebanon. This is something that neither China nor Russia would like. That is why the US will never get a favourable UN Security Council resolution to hit Iran. It would have to do it unilaterally. There are no allies for Trump apart from Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates: This is a Coalition of the Foolish.

Recklessness

Recklessness is not the mood in Tehran—nor in Moscow or Beijing. That should by now be clear.

If you want to identify the most reckless powers in our world today, look no further than Israel, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and US.

Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu has said that he wants to annex the illegal settlements in the West Bank into Israel and leave a small, encircled rump territory occupied; this rump would include Ramallah. East Jerusalem would also likely be snatched fully in this move. This is recklessness. The reaction in Palestine would be another intifada, and—very likely—it would occasion rocket strikes not only from Gaza but also from Lebanon. Such an annexation would be an invitation to war.

Saudi Arabia and the UAE have been at war against Yemen since 2015. It is a ghastly war, a reckless war, one for which there is no end in sight. Trump wants advice on how to deal with Iran from the architect of that war—Mohammed bin Salman. This is madness of the highest kind—asking a man who is in the midst of an intractable war whether one should go to war.

Which brings us to the US. 

Trump has threatened war against Venezuela and Iran.

He has used the entire apparatus of the US war and money machine to conduct a hybrid war against these states. He has thus far not sanctioned a bombing run on them. But you never know. As I type these lines, Trump might be signing a document to authorise war.

No one on the planet wants Trump’s wars. We can march on the streets as we did in 2003, and the US would not pay attention to us. Certainly, Bush did not, and certainly Trump will not. The US is a reckless power. It needs to be checked.

Vijay Prashad is an Indian historian, editor and journalist. He is a writing fellow and chief correspondent at Globetrotter, a project of the Independent Media Institute. He is the chief editor of LeftWord Books and the director of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research. 

Source: Independent Media Institute

This article was produced by Globetrotter, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

 

Trump
Iran
Iran Sanctions
Oil War
Oil Prices
Russia
China
Israel
Netanyahu
Saudi
UAE
Related Stories

The Ballad of India’s Kashmir and Israel’s Palestine

India Has Fewer Researchers Than China and South Korea, Says Report

India Has Fewer Researchers Than China and South Korea, Says Report

How to Commit War Crimes

How to Commit War Crimes—and Get Away With It

India’s Foreign Policy:

India’s Foreign Policy: A New Dogma in the Making

After the Supreme Court order regarding

Political Lessons in Maharashtra

SOUTHERN KURIL ISLANDS AND RUSSO-JAPANESE BORDERS

Russia Dials Back Peace Talks With Japan

Replies in Parliament by two ministers ducked the question whether a government agency used Pegasus to hack citizens phones.

Ministers Play Hide-and-Seek in Parliament on Pegasus

In Iran, Despondency and Resilience Unite

Israel and Palestine

US Nod for Settlements is Further Boost to Israeli Occupation of Palestine

WhatsApp Snooping

WhatsApp Snooping, Reporters Suffer in Kashmir and More


Related Stories

The resignation of prime minister Adel Abdul Mahdi
Peoples Dispatch

The Trajectory of Popular Protests in Iraq

08 December 2019
Political uncertainty in Iraq has intensified with the resignation of prime minister Adel Abdul Mahdi.
ICF Team

Through Fifty Years of Palestinian Resistance

07 December 2019
Walking the streets of Ramallah on the fiftieth year of the Israeli occupation, in Going Home: A Walk Through Fifty Years of Occupation, 
Trump
Newsclick Team

Trump's Impeachment and the US as a Global Policeman

02 December 2019
In this episode of Mapping Faultlines, we look at the politics behind the Democrats' bid to impeach Donald Trump.

Pagination

  • Next page ››

More

  • ‘With Religion as its Basis

    ‘With Religion as its Basis, CAB Threatens Idea of India’

  • Haryana Whistleblower Case:

    Haryana Whistleblower Case: Court Orders Arrest Warrants Against 2 Tata Housing Executives

  • CAB Protest: National Awardee Jahnu Barua Pulls Out 'Bhoga Khirikee' from Assam Film Festival

    CAB Protest: National Awardee Jahnu Barua Pulls Out 'Bhoga Khirikee' from Assam Film Festival

  • CAB: Slew of Protests Erupt

    CAB: Slew of Protests Erupt, Trains Affected, Shops, Schools Closed During Assam Bandh

  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with
about
contact