NewsClick

NewsClick
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Covid-19
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • International
  • Sports
  • Articles
  • Videos
search
menu

SUBSCRIBE AND SUPPORT

image/svg+xml
  • All Articles
  • Newsclick Articles
  • All Videos
  • Newsclick Videos
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • Sports
  • International
  • Africa
  • Latin America
  • Palestine
  • Nepal
  • Pakistan
  • Sri Lanka
  • US
  • West Asia
About us
Grievance Redressal Mechanism
Newsletter
Facebook - Newsclick Twitter - Newsclick Instagram - Newsclick Youtube - Newsclick RSS - Newsclick
close menu
×
You deserve independent, critical media. Subscribe and Support
Covid-19
Politics
India

SC Pulls up States on Disbursal of COVID-19 Death Claims, Summons AP, Bihar Chief Secretaries

The Court said that it rejects the COVID-19 death toll given by Bihar, and that these are not actual but government figures.
The Leaflet
20 Jan 2022
S CRT

THE Supreme Court, on Wednesday, pulled up state governments for failing to disburse claims to the next of kin of COVID-19 victims and issued a show-cause notice to the Andhra Pradesh chief secretary as to why contempt action be not initiated against him.

The Supreme Court asked the chief secretaries of Andhra Pradesh and Bihar to remain present virtually at 2 PM on Wednesday and explain why disbursals – Rs 50,000 ex gratia for COVID-19 death – have been so few in their states.

A bench of Justices M R Shah and Sanjiv Khanna said that it will pass orders at 2 PM and asked the state legal service authorities (SLSA) to reach the families who have lost their near and dear ones to COVID-19, to facilitate registration and disbursal of claims like it was done during the 2001 Gujarat earthquake.

The Court said that it rejects the COVID-19 death toll given by Bihar, and that these are not actual but government figures.

“We are not going to believe that only 12,000 people died in the state of Bihar due to Covid. We want your chief secretary to be here virtually at 2 PM”, the bench told the counsel appearing for the Bihar government.

The Court was hearing a batch of pleas by advocate Gaurav Kumar Bansal and intervenors, represented by advocate Sumeer Sodhi, seeking ex-gratia assistance to family members of COVID-19 victims.

On December 13 last year, the Court had slammed states for not giving wide publicity about a portal developed for disbursal of ex-gratia compensation for COVID-19 deaths. It had said that unless wide publicity is given, people will not be able to know the portal address on which they can make online applications.

The Court had noted that some states have not given wide publicity by giving full details of the portal in advertisements in newspapers, particularly in vernacular ones, and local channels.

The Court had earlier asked the Centre to gather information from states on the progress made on disbursal of ex-gratia compensation of Rs 50,000 to the kin of COVID-19 victims and pulled up the Gujarat government for issuing notification constituting a scrutiny committee, contrary to its directions.

On November 18 last year, the Supreme Court had pulled up the Gujarat government for issuing a notification that was “just contrary” to the directions given regarding ex-gratia to the next of kin of those who died due to COVID-19 and said an attempt has been made to “overreach” the directions issued by the Court.

It had said on October 4 last year that no state shall deny ex-gratia compensation of Rs 50,000 to the next of kin of the deceased due to COVID-19 solely on the ground that the death certificate does not mention the virus as the cause of death.

The Court had also said that the ex-gratia is to be disbursed within 30 days from the date of applying to the district disaster management authority or the district administration concerned along with the proof of the death of the deceased due to coronavirus and the cause of death being certified as died due to COVID-19.

It had said that its directions for payment of compensation to the family members of the persons, who died due to COVID-19, are very clear and there was no requirement at all of constituting the scrutiny committee to award compensation.

(With PTI inputs.)

Courtesy: The Leaflet
Get the latest reports & analysis with people's perspective on Protests, movements & deep analytical videos, discussions of the current affairs in your Telegram app. Subscribe to NewsClick's Telegram channel & get Real-Time updates on stories, as they get published on our website.
COVID-19
supreme court
Related Stories
What is the Possibility of Getting rid of Sedition law?

What is the Possibility of Getting rid of Sedition law?

Delhi: Major Victory for DU Teachers as Supreme Court Restores Pensions

Delhi: Major Victory for DU Teachers as Supreme Court Restores Pensions

News Round up

Monsoon Set to Arrive Early, Onset Over Andaman on May 15: IMD

Sedition under challenge: Supreme Court directs pending cases under Section 124A IPC to be kept in abeyance

Sedition Under Challenge: Supreme Court Directs Pending Cases Under Section 124A IPC to Be Kept in Abeyance

Sedition Law

SC Stays All Proceedings in Sedition Cases, Asks Centre, States to Not File Fresh FIRs

Sedition case in Supreme Court: Government may have gained time, but its options are limited

Sedition Case in Supreme Court: Government May Have Gained Time, But its Options are Limited

Centre Says it Will Re-examine Sedition law, SC Seeks Govt's Reply on Protecting Citizens in Interim

Centre Says it Will Re-examine Sedition law, SC Seeks Govt's Reply on Protecting Citizens in Interim

wb

West Bengal: In its 11th Conference, Bangiya Saksharata Prasar Samity Advocates Multi-dimensional Learning Centres

Shaheen Bagh

Delhi: Bulldozer Culture Won't Work Here, Say Shaheen Bagh Residents Amid High Drama

Supreme Court of India

SC Stays Further Proceedings Before HCs in Matters Involving Challenges to IT Rules

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share
You deserve independent, critical media. We want readers like you. Support independent, critical media. Subscribe to Newsclick.

Subscribe and Support


Latest

  • Ban on Wheat Exports 'Anti-Farmer' Move, say Punjab Farmers' Unions

    Ban on Wheat Exports 'Anti-Farmer' Move, say Punjab Farmers' Unions

  • Make PDS Universal at Least

    Activists Object to Distribution of Fortified Rice Through PDS

  • ‘Can’t use Toilet, Bathe’: Jailed Prof G N Saibaba to Begin Indefinite Hunger Strike if CCTV Not Removed From Cell

    ‘Can’t use Toilet, Bathe’: Jailed Prof G N Saibaba to Begin Indefinite Hunger Strike if CCTV Not Removed From Cell

  • Adaptation and Finance Remain Global Key Challenges in Climate Change

    Heat Waves, Floods, Heavy Rain: Spectre of Climate Change Getting Worse, Warn Experts

  • Load More
Newsletter
About us
Grievance Redressal Mechanism