NewsClick

NewsClick
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Covid-19
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • International
  • Sports
  • Articles
  • Videos
search
menu

SUBSCRIBE AND SUPPORT

image/svg+xml
  • All Articles
  • Newsclick Articles
  • All Videos
  • Newsclick Videos
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • Sports
  • International
  • Africa
  • Latin America
  • Palestine
  • Nepal
  • Pakistan
  • Sri Lanka
  • US
  • West Asia
About us
Grievance Redressal Mechanism
Newsletter
Facebook - Newsclick Twitter - Newsclick Instagram - Newsclick Youtube - Newsclick RSS - Newsclick
close menu
×
You deserve independent, critical media. Subscribe and Support
Politics
India

SC Rejects Maharashtra’s Plea to Direct Centre to Disclose Data on OBCs as Per 2011 Caste Census

The Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a plea filed by the Maharashtra government seeking a direction to the Centre and other authorities to disclose to the state “the raw caste data of the Other Backward Classes (OBCs)” obtained from the Socio-Economic and Caste Census (SECC) 2011.
The Leaflet
16 Dec 2021
SC rejects Maharashtra’s plea to direct Centre to disclose data on OBCs as per 2011 caste census

New Delhi, Dec 15 (PTI) The Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a plea filed by the Maharashtra government seeking a direction to the Centre and other authorities to disclose to the state “the raw caste data of the Other Backward Classes (OBCs)” obtained from the Socio-Economic and Caste Census (SECC) 2011.

A bench of Justices A.M. Khanwilkar and C.T. Ravikumar noted the affidavit filed by the Centre before it emphatically stated that the data of SECC 2011 is not accurate and unusable.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, told the bench that the SECC 2011 data is absolutely unreliable as several infirmities were found in it.

Senior advocate Shekhar Naphade, appearing for Maharashtra, told the bench that the Centre cannot claim before the Supreme court that the data is full of errors as the government had told a Parliamentary committee that the data was 98.87 percent error-free.

The bench, while rejecting the petition, said the state is at liberty to pursue other remedies available under the law.

The Centre had on Tuesday told the apex court that the SECC 2011 is “not” an OBC data and it was not made public as it was found to be flawed, and bound to mislead .

Mehta had argued that no reliance can be placed on the SECC 2011, not only for reservation but also for employment, education and other purposes.

The Centre had in September this year filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court saying caste Census of Backward Classes is administratively difficult and cumbersome and excluding such information from the purview of Census is a “conscious policy decision”.

The government had said in its affidavit, filed by the secretary of the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, that caste enumeration in the SECC 2011 was fraught with mistakes and inaccuracies.

It had claimed that the Centre had already issued a notification in January last year prescribing the series of information to be collected during Census 2021 and it covers many areas including the information relating to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes but does not refer to any other category of caste.

The Centre had also said that the SECC 2011 survey was not on the OBCs as alleged, but a comprehensive exercise to enumerate the caste status of all households in the country, as per their statement.

Courtesy: The Leaflet
Get the latest reports & analysis with people's perspective on Protests, movements & deep analytical videos, discussions of the current affairs in your Telegram app. Subscribe to NewsClick's Telegram channel & get Real-Time updates on stories, as they get published on our website.
supreme court
Other Backward Classes
Socio-Economic and Caste Census
Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment
Maharashtra Government
Related Stories
Teesta Setalvad

Teesta Setalvad Arrest: Outpouring of Support and Solidarity for the Activist

Teesta Setalvad

Gujarat ATS Detains Activist Teesta Setalvad

Mavalli Shankar, President, DSS (Ambedkarvada)

Dalit Activists Storm DC Office in Bengaluru Over Land Rights

Supreme Court draws a parallel between 2002 Gujarat pogrom and the COVID second wave to rule out criminal conspiracy

Supreme Court Draws a Parallel Between 2002 Gujarat Pogrom and the COVID Second Wave to Rule Out Criminal Conspiracy

Federalism can also be “uncooperative”: Significance of the Supreme Court’s recent judgment

Federalism Can Also be “Uncooperative”: Significance of the Supreme Court’s Recent Judgment

PULIC INTREST LITIGATION

Why PILs Are Necessary for Securing a Welfare State

education

Parents of EWS XI Students Shocked as Delhi’s Modern School demands Rs 67,000 Fees

Singur

Bengal: DYFI Begins Survey of Singur Farmers Who Haven’t Got Back Land Despite SC Order

SUPREME COURT

Supreme Court Directs Sanitation Workers of Jammu and Kashmir to be Paid Wages Pending for Over a Decade

Even if President commuted death sentence to life imprisonment without remission, furlough cannot be denied: Supreme Court

SC on Demolitions: UP Authorities Should Strictly Follow Due Process Under Law

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share
You deserve independent, critical media. We want readers like you. Support independent, critical media. Subscribe to Newsclick.

Subscribe and Support


Latest

  • AAP

    Bypolls: AAP Retains Rajinder Nagar, Suffers jolt in Sangrur

  • Serena Williams at Wimbledon 2022

    Serena Williams’ Comeback at Wimbledon: One for the History Books and Beyond

  • Neeraj Chopra

    Field Gets Tougher as Neeraj Chopra Tries to Maintain Winning Momentum in Stockholm Ahead of World Championships

  • Agneepath Does not Honour Indian Army: PDP Chief Mehbooba Mufti

    Agneepath Does not Honour Indian Army: PDP Chief Mehbooba Mufti

  • Load More
Newsletter
About us
Grievance Redressal Mechanism