NewsClick

NewsClick
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Covid-19
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • International
  • Sports
  • Articles
  • Videos
search
menu

INTERACTIVE ELECTION MAPS

image/svg+xml
  • All Articles
  • Newsclick Articles
  • All Videos
  • Newsclick Videos
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • Sports
  • International
  • Africa
  • Latin America
  • Palestine
  • Nepal
  • Pakistan
  • Sri Lanka
  • US
  • West Asia
About us
Subscribe
Follow us Facebook - Newsclick Twitter - Newsclick RSS - Newsclick
close menu
×
For latest updates on nCOVID-19 around the world visit our INTERACTIVE COVID MAP
Politics
India

SC Slams Allahabad HC for Providing Ex-BJP MP Accused of Sexual Harassment With Complainant’s Statement

The Supreme Court Thursday slammed the Allahabad High Court for allowing former Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Chinmayanand to access a copy of the statement by the 23-year-old woman who had filed a sexual harassment case against him.
The Leaflet
09 Oct 2020
Swami Chinmayananand

Swami Chinmayananand

The Supreme Court Thursday slammed the Allahabad High Court for allowing former Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Chinmayanand to access a copy of the statement by the 23-year-old woman who had filed a sexual harassment case against him.

“The right to receive a copy of such a statement (made under Section 164 of the CrPC) will arise only after cognizance is taken and at the stage contemplated by Sections 207 and 208 of the Code and not before”, the Court said.

It added that the filing of the charge-sheet by itself did not entitle an accused to copies of any of the relevant documents including a statement under Section 164 of the Code.

By the time, the victim could challenge the decision of the High Court, a copy of her statement recorded under Section 164 of the CrPC was made available to the accused.

(LtoR)- Justice Vineet Saran, Justice UU Lalit and Justice Ravindra Bhat.

Section 164 of the CrPC provides for the recording of confessions and statements before the Magistrate.

Chiding the High Court for its erroneous decision, a three-judge bench led by Justice U U Lalit said that the High Court completely erred in its understanding of the directions issued by the apex Court in the State of Karnataka by Nonavinakere Police vs. Shivanna alias Tarkari Shivanna, especially in a matter where the offences alleged against the accused were of sexual exploitation.

“In such matters utmost confidentiality is required to be maintained. In our view, the High Court completely failed in that behalf”, the bench said which also comprised Justices Vineet Saran and Ravindra Bhat.

In the Shivanna case, the top court had held that a statement under Section 164 CrPC should be handed over to the investigating officer immediately with a specific direction that the contents of such statement should not be disclosed to any person till a charge-sheet/report under Section 173 CrPC is filed.

Referring to Section 190 of the CrPC which deals with cognizance of offences by a Magistrate, the bench held that it is only after cognizance is taken and process is issued that the accused is entitled, in terms of Sections 207 and 208 of the CrPC, to copies of these documents. The bench, thus, held that the filing of a charge-sheet by itself did not entitle an accused to copies of the statement under Section 164 of the CrPC.

However, the Allahabad High Court erred in its understanding of the decision of the top court in Shivanna, and instead relied upon its own decision in Raju Janki Yadav vs. State of U.P. and others which was rendered before the decision in Shivanna.

The bench has now held that the decision of the Division Bench of the High Court on which reliance was placed in the present matter must be held to be subject to the directions issued by this Court in the Shivanna case.

The bench eventually held that though, a copy of the statement recorded under Section 164 of the Code was made over to the accused, the order of the High Court was set aside. It also said that under no circumstances should copies of statements recorded under Section 164 of the Code be furnished till appropriate orders are passed by the Court after taking cognizance in the matter.

Chinmayanand is accused of offences punishable under Sections 376C (Intercourse by superintendent of jail, remand home, etc.), 354D(stalking), 342 (wrongful confinement), 506(criminal intimidation)of IPC.

An LLM student of SS Law College, run by Mumukshu Ashram of Chinmayanand, had accused the Swami of rape and harassment for over a year.  He was arrested on September 20, 2019 and languished in Shajahanpur district jail till he got bail from High Court on February 3, this year.

In September last year, the apex court had instructed the state government to constitute SIT to inquire into the allegations. It had also directed the Chief Justice of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad to constitute a Bench to monitor the investigations of the case.

Read Judgment

Supreme Court Judgment by Newsclick on Scribd

The article was originally published in The Leaflet.

Get the latest reports & analysis with people's perspective on Protests, movements & deep analytical videos, discussions of the current affairs in your Telegram app. Subscribe to NewsClick's Telegram channel & get Real-Time updates on stories, as they get published on our website.
supreme court
Bharatiya Janata Party
Sexual Harassment Case
Chinmayanand
high court
Allahabad HC
Related Stories
2 Months On, 60 Lives Lost, 9 Rounds of Talks: Protesting Farmers are a Picture of Hope

2 Months On, 60 Lives Lost, 9 Rounds of Talks: Protesting Farmers are a Picture of Hope

In Significant Victory for Home Buyers, SC Rejects Developer’s Appeal on Excess Sale Area

In Significant Victory for Home Buyers, SC Rejects Developer’s Appeal on Excess Sale Area

SC issues notice to Meghalaya govt in Shillong Times Editor Patricia Mukhim’s case

SC Issues Notice to Meghalaya Govt in Shillong Times Editor Patricia Mukhim’s Case

The design for 'Central Vista' project

Modi’s Central Vista: Justice Undone

religion.

Can the State Dictate what Religion you will Follow and who you will Marry?

Farmers Protest Singhu.

Elderly Farmers Thank SC for ‘Concern’, Refuse to Return Until Farm Laws Repealed

merige

Mandatory Publication of Notice of Intended Marriage Under Special Marriage Act Violates Right to Privacy; Allahabad holds it optional

TN

Tamil Nadu Transport Workers ‘Betrayed’ by Govt, Wage Hike Indefinitely Postponed

Haryana: In Solidarity With Farmers, Workers Gherao DC Offices in All Districts

Haryana: In Solidarity With Farmers, Workers Gherao DC Offices in All Districts

Central Vista

Everything You Need to Know About Central Vista Judgment and Dissent

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share

Related Stories

PTI

Farmers’ Tractor Rally on Jan 26 a Law & Order Issue...Let Police Decide: SC

18 January 2021
New Delhi: The Supreme Court told the Centre on Monday that the proposed tractor rally on the Republic Day by farmers protesting against the new fa
Monica Dhanraj

Munawar Faruqui Case Makes Idea of Democracy Illusory

16 January 2021
The new year began on a bitter note for stand-up artist Munawar Faruqui, who was arrested in Indore only on the insistence of a well-connected
Ronak Chhabra

At Civic Workers’ March in Delhi, Utensils Banged to Press for Pending Salaries

15 January 2021
New Delhi: “Naa aata hai, naa daal hai, ghar ka bura haal hai (There is no flour and no pulses, the house, too, is in bad

Pagination

  • Next page ››

More

  • South Africa's Trailblazing Black Food Writer Dies of COVID-19

    South Africa's Trailblazing Black Food Writer Dies of COVID-19

  • MP Police Reports First Case of ‘Love-Jihad’ Under New Freedom of Religion Law

    MP Police Reports First Case of ‘Love-Jihad’ Under New Freedom of Religion Law

  • Mining

    After Cabinet Nod, Environmentalist Question Need to Rush Big Ticket Mining ‘Reforms’

  • Gujarat: 15 Migrant Workers Sleeping on Roadside Crushed to Death in Surat

    Gujarat: 14 Migrant Workers, Baby Girl Sleeping on Roadside Crushed to Death in Surat

  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with
about