NewsClick

NewsClick
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Covid-19
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • International
  • Sports
  • Articles
  • Videos
search
menu

SUBSCRIBE AND SUPPORT

image/svg+xml
  • All Articles
  • Newsclick Articles
  • All Videos
  • Newsclick Videos
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • Sports
  • International
  • Africa
  • Latin America
  • Palestine
  • Nepal
  • Pakistan
  • Sri Lanka
  • US
  • West Asia
About us
Grievance Redressal Mechanism
Newsletter
Facebook - Newsclick Twitter - Newsclick Instagram - Newsclick Youtube - Newsclick RSS - Newsclick
close menu
×
You deserve independent, critical media. Subscribe and Support
Politics
India

CBI Interim Director: SC Adjourns Hearing to Feb 6

Attorney General K K Venugopal says High-Powered Committee is set to meet on Friday to select the new CBI Director. Submits that Nageswara Rao’s appointment was made on the basis of sanction from the Department of Personnel and Training.
Live Law
01 Feb 2019
Supreme Court

The Supreme Court bench of Justices Arun Mishra and Deepak Gupta adjourned to February 6 the petition filed by NGO Common Cause and RTI Activist Anjali Bhardwaj questioning the appointment of Nageswara Rao as CBI Interim Director.

The Attorney General K K Venugopal submitted on Friday that the High Powered Committee is set to meet on Friday to select the new CBI Director. The AG also submitted that the appointment of Rao was made on the basis of sanction from the Department of Personnel and Training.

The bench observed that CBI cannot be kept under the control of Interim Director for long. Then, the bench adjourned hearing on the matter, saying "it will watch what happens in the meeting today".

On Thursday, Justice N V Ramana recused from hearing the plea, becoming the third judge to recuse from the plea after CJI Ranjan Gogoi and Justice AK Sikri.

On January 21, CJI Gogoi had recused from hearing the petition, citing the reason that he was part of the High Powered Committee for selection of next CBI Director. The matter was, therefore, assigned to the bench headed by Justice Sikri, the next senior judge.

Later, Justice Sikri too recused from hearing the petition on January 24. After that matter was assigned to the bench headed by Justice Bobde, the third senior judge. However, it got assigned to the bench of Justice Ramana, the fourth senior judge, as Justice Bobde is unavailable due to medical leave.

It may be noted that Justice Sikri was part of the High Powered Committee which took the decision to remove Alok Verma as CBI Director, two days after he was directed to be reinstated by the SC. Then the Government appointed Nageswara Rao as interim Director.

Though, Dushyant Dave, senior advocate appearing for the petitioners expressed that they have no objection in Justice Sikri hearing the petition, he said "I have my predicaments".

 Justice Sikri had got entangled in controversy, after news emerged that he was being nominated by the Centre to the Commonwealth Secretariat Arbitration Tribunal at London, after his retirement in coming March. Since the news broke immediately after the Committee meeting of January 10, it led to a lot of speculations. Following this, Justice Sikri announced revocation of his consent to be nominated to CSAT.

Verma submitted his resignation on January 12, after the Committee's decision to remove him as CBI Director. The Committee comprising PM Modi, CJI Gogoi and Leader of Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge is yet to decide on the next CBI Director.

The article has been edited by Newsclick. The full article can be read here: 

https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/cbi-interim-director-nageshwar-rao-142570

Get the latest reports & analysis with people's perspective on Protests, movements & deep analytical videos, discussions of the current affairs in your Telegram app. Subscribe to NewsClick's Telegram channel & get Real-Time updates on stories, as they get published on our website.
Nageswara Rao
Central Bureau of Investigation
Justice Arun Mishra
supreme court
Related Stories
The government’s gambit to save sedition

The Government’s Gambit to Save Sedition

Gyanvapi Mosque

Gyanvapi Case: Varanasi District Court to Decide on Maintainability on May 26

Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991: A shield for Indian secularism?

Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991: A Shield for Indian Secularism?

‘Sometimes Firmness Stops More Problems From Fracturing the Future’—Sanjay Hegde

‘Sometimes Firmness Stops More Problems From Fracturing the Future’—Sanjay Hegde

meerut

Maliyana Massacre: 35 Years, 800 Court Dates on, No Justice for Victims Yet

Image Courtesy: PTI

Will Gyanvapi Dispute Cause More Strife or is the Temple-Mosque Gambit Over?

Is the GST Council a star chamber?

Is the GST Council a Star Chamber?

pegasus

Pegasus: SC Extends Time for Submitting Probe Report on Use of Israeli Spyware

Image Courtesy:tribuneindia.com

Sex Workers Can’t be Harassed, Can’t be Confined to Shelter Homes: SC

Dignified Treatment of Disabled Travellers

NPRD Welcomes SC Interim Order on Exemption in Job Reservation to Persons with Disabilities

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share
You deserve independent, critical media. We want readers like you. Support independent, critical media. Subscribe to Newsclick.

Subscribe and Support


Latest

  • kashmir

    Protests Erupt in Srinagar as Court Awards Life Sentence to Yasin Malik

  • UP: Not Provided With Safety Equipment, Another Sanitation Worker Dies Cleaning a Sewer

    UP: Not Provided With Safety Equipment, Another Sanitation Worker Dies Cleaning a Sewer

  • J&K HC Grants Bail to PDP Leader Waheed Para; Mehbooba, Lone Hail Decision

    J&K HC Grants Bail to PDP Leader Waheed Para; Mehbooba, Lone Hail Decision

  • SHIREEN

    CNN Probe Shows Veteran Al Jazeera Journo Deliberately Targeted by Israeli Forces

  • Load More
Newsletter
About us
Grievance Redressal Mechanism