NewsClick

NewsClick
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Covid-19
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • International
  • Sports
  • Articles
  • Videos
search
menu

INTERACTIVE ELECTION MAPS

image/svg+xml
  • All Articles
  • Newsclick Articles
  • All Videos
  • Newsclick Videos
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • Sports
  • International
  • Africa
  • Latin America
  • Palestine
  • Nepal
  • Pakistan
  • Sri Lanka
  • US
  • West Asia
About us
Subscribe
Follow us Facebook - Newsclick Twitter - Newsclick RSS - Newsclick
close menu
×
For latest updates on nCOVID-19 around the world visit our INTERACTIVE COVID MAP
Politics
India

A Law on Data Privacy Should Also Place Restrictions on its Exceptions

An RBI notification for maintaining data privacy rings hollow in the absence of specific legislation.
Newsclick Report
30 May 2018
Data Privacy

On April 6, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) issued a notification to the heads of all banks and corporates offering online payment interfaces. The notification pertained to storing all payment information in India for a period of six months. The purpose as stated by the notification was to enable better monitoring of payments to ensure that safety and security measures are adopted. However, in the absence of a data protection legislation, it is laughable that the RBI wants to ensure the protection of customers' data.

On May 25 Cobrapost exposed Paytm for sharing user data with the PMO. Though Paytm has denied sharing user data with anyone other than government agencies, they neither refuted nor contradicted the allegations raised by Cobrapost. The issue here is that the current law regarding privacy is at best vague.

The Information Technology Act, 2000 has broad provisions regarding privacy. Section 72 imposes criminal liability upon authorised persons for sharing personal information with any third party. Section 43 provides for a list of contraventions under the Act. Similarly the Information Technology (Reasonable security practices and procedures and sensitive personal data or information) Rules, 2011 also provide for breaches of privacy. However, all of these laws make an exception to a person’s privacy to the extent that a government authority requests the data. The Rules themselves do not specifically state how the data ought to be protected – despite Rules often being drafted by persons with technical expertise. The right to privacy Judgement of the Supreme Court has established privacy as a fundamental right, however, the specific boundaries of this right have not been outlined. Thus, national security is still a viable defence on the part of the government for breaching a citizen's privacy.

The 2011 Rules, however, do not specifically assign liability for a breach of privacy. At present, the most a consumer can hope for is to bring an action under the Contract Act of 1872. Though the action in this instance would be more in the nature of a 'breach of contract' rather than a 'breach of privacy'. The Srikrishna Committee is expected to suggest a framework for a data protection law. However, the Shah Committee report on the same issue was already submitted in 2012. The Shah Committee was not implemented even though they had recommended that privacy be considered a fundamental right under Article 21. However, the Shah Committee report did mention that limitations can be placed on privacy under the headings of national security, public order, disclosure in public interest, prevention, detection, investigation, and prosecution of criminal offences and protection of the individual or of the rights and freedoms of others.

The aspect of national security is troubling because it has been used and misused in the past for justifying all actions taken by the government, whether proportionate or not. Unless a data privacy law includes specific limitations on requests for data under the heading of national security, it will be meaningless. The problem is that partisan politics often makes its way into executive actions, thus government agencies can collect an individual's sensitive data citing national security for purely political purposes.

Get the latest reports & analysis with people's perspective on Protests, movements & deep analytical videos, discussions of the current affairs in your Telegram app. Subscribe to NewsClick's Telegram channel & get Real-Time updates on stories, as they get published on our website.
Data privacy
Right to Privacy
Cobrapost
Paytm
IT
Related Stories
‘Telangana’s New Revenue Reforms Hasty and Technically Unsound’

‘Telangana’s New Revenue Reforms Hasty and Technically Unsound’

Who Created Aarogya Setu? Govt Has No Clue; RTI Body Issues Show-cause Notices

Who Created Aarogya Setu? Govt Has No Clue; RTI Body Issues Show-cause Notices

DIGIPUB

11 Digital-Only Platforms Join Hands to Launch DIGIPUB for a ‘Healthy News Ecosystem’

Mass surveillance

NCRB’s Facial Recognition System Will Lead to Discrimination and Surveillance, Warns Advocacy Group

Google Removes Paytm App from Play Store for ‘Policy Violation’ on Sports Betting

Google Removes Paytm App from Play Store for ‘Policy Violation’ on Sports Betting

Trump's threat to ban TIktok

TikTok Ban and Trump’s Extortionist Policies

NDHM: An All-Out Drive for Privatisation of Healthcare

NDHM: An All-Out Drive for Privatisation of Healthcare

Data From Big Tech and Monopolies

Reclaiming Non-Personal Data From Big Tech and Monopolies

TikTok: Trump Helps Microsoft

TikTok: Trump Helps Microsoft in Discount Shopping

Jio

JIO-FB-Google: Who Controls Our Data?

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share

Related Stories

Sasank, Prabir Purkayastha

The Ugly Truth of WhatsApp’s User Data Privacy

16 January 2021
WhatsApp, a company owned by Facebook since 2014, has issued a new privacy policy for its two billion users changing
PTI

Data Security? EC Allows Voters’ List to Used for COVID Vaccination Drive

15 January 2021
New Delhi: The Election Commission will extend
Rosamma Thomas

Was Policy Changed to Accommodate Paytm on Govt Appstore?

07 January 2021
The Mobile Seva

Pagination

  • Next page ››

More

  • Paranjoy Guha Thakurta

    Gujarat Court Issues Arrest Warrant Against Senior Journalist Paranjoy Guha Thakurta

  • journalist UAPA Manipur.

    Digital Media Organisations Condemn Manipur Journalists Being Detained, Slapped with UAPA

  • NIMZ

    Ahead of Public Hearing, Farmers and Scientists Oppose Telangana’s NIMZ project

  • Climate Change: Tropical Rain Belt of Earth May Alter Position, Says New Research

    Climate Change: Tropical Rain Belt of Earth May Alter Position, Says New Research

  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with
about