Judgement Copies has Been Brought
Judgment copies have been brought in courtroom 1 and placed before the 5 judges.
The Supreme Court is announcing its verdict on politically sensitive Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute at Ayodhya.
Judgment copies have been brought in courtroom 1 and placed before the 5 judges.
CJI has begun reading out judgment. There is one verdict which has been endorsed by all 5 judges.
Suit 3 filed by Nirmohi Akhara is governed by Article 120 of Limitation Act and is barred by limitation, Supreme Court
The claim of Nirmohi Akhara is only of management. Nirmohi Akhara is not a Shabait, rules Supreme Court
"Court should preserve balance", Supreme Court.
"Mosque built by Mir Baqi on order of Babur".
"Idols were placed in the mosque in 1949", Supreme Court
This Court set up under Constitutional scheme should defer from interfering with faith and belief of worshippers.
#Breaking: Ram Janma Bhoomi not a juristic person, holds Supreme Court.
#RamJanmbhoomi #RamJanmabhoomi #AYODHYAVERDICT
There is adequate material in ASI report to conclude the following:
Babri Masjid not constructed on vacant land. There was a structure underlying the disputed structure.
The underlying structure was not an Islamic structure, Supreme Court.
#BabriMasjid #AYODHYAVERDICT
The underline structure was not of Islamic.. Existence of temple structure...supported by evidence. : But ASI does not support whether the temple was demolished : SC
#AYODHYAVERDICT
SC : The accounts of the travellers must be read with introspection. Court must be circumspect in taking conclusions from what a traveller may have seen and observed
#AYODHYAVERDICT
SC holds the suit by Sunni Waqf Board to be within limitation.
The Board has authority to institute legal proceedings
#AYODHYAVERDICT #AyodhyaHearing
The cross-examination of the witnesses has not led the court to believe that the faith of Hindus is not justified : SC
SC : Historical accounts indicate the belief of Hindus that Ayodhya was birthplace of Lord Ram
#AYODHYAVERDICT #AyodhyaHearing
SC holds that the mosque was not abandoned; mere cessation of namaz by Muslims cannot lead to inference that mosque was abandoned, and they lost possession
#AYODHYAVERDICT
Sunni Board cannot claim adverse possession : SC
#AYODHYAVERDICT
Muslims offered prayer inside the inner courtyard while the same was done by Hindus in the outer court yard : SC
#AYODHYAVERDICT
SC: Waqf Board has claims on 2.77 acres. Hindu parties earlier used to pray near Ram Chabutra and Sita Rasoi but later they made claims on the central dome.
Damage to Babri Mosque was violation of law: SC
Govt. to set up a trust in 3 months which will be handed over land by the Govt: SC
Get the latest reports & analysis with people's perspective on Protests, movements & deep analytical videos, discussions of the current affairs in your Telegram app. Subscribe to NewsClick's Telegram channel & get Real-Time updates on stories, as they get published on our website.