NewsClick

NewsClick
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Covid-19
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • International
  • Sports
  • Articles
  • Videos
search
menu

INTERACTIVE ELECTION MAPS

image/svg+xml
  • All Articles
  • Newsclick Articles
  • All Videos
  • Newsclick Videos
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • Sports
  • International
  • Africa
  • Latin America
  • Palestine
  • Nepal
  • Pakistan
  • Sri Lanka
  • US
  • West Asia
About us
Subscribe
Follow us Facebook - Newsclick Twitter - Newsclick RSS - Newsclick
close menu
×
For latest updates on nCOVID-19 around the world visit our INTERACTIVE COVID MAP
Labour
Politics
India

Ordinances Issued by State Governors to Freeze Labour Laws Unconstitutional, Says Former SC Judge

After the Karnataka government recommended its governor to pass a similar ordinance, Justice Venkate Gopala Gowda has argued in an open letter that such an ordinance passed without prior presidential assent "is not permissible in law" when it is in conflict with existing central legislation.
Pavan Kulkarni
15 May 2020
Ordinances Issued by State Governors to Freeze Labour Laws Unconstitutional, Says Former SC Judge

Supreme Court judge Justice Venkate Gopala Gowda. Image Courtesy: Live Law

After the Karnataka government, taking cue from other BJP-ruled states, allegedly recommended its Governor to pass a similar ordinance to freeze most of the labour laws, former Supreme Court judge Justice Venkate Gopala Gowda penned an open letter arguing that such ordinances are unconstitutional.

Justice Gowda wrote that such an ordinance not only violated the International labour standards which India is bound by, but will also "be in blatant violation of Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy" and "amount to forced labour".

Moreover, he stated that it "is not permissible within the law" for the Governor to pass an ordinance in direct conflict with central laws which have been passed by the Parliament with the assent of the President, unless the latter himself instructed the governor to pass such an ordinance.

Article 213(1) of the Constitution permits a governor to pass ordinances if, during a time when the state Legislative Assembly and Council are not in session, he or she feels that circumstances "render it necessary for him to take immediate action."

However, the same article which grants the governor this authority explicitly sets out the limitation that "the Governor shall not, without instructions from the President, promulgate any such Ordinance if" an Act passed by the state legislature, "containing the same provisions" as the ordinance, "would under this Constitution have been invalid unless, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, it had received the assent of the President”.In his letter, Justice Gowda argued that therefore, "Without instructions from the President of India.. the proposed Ordinance shall not be promulgated by the Governor of Karnataka...", since it is related to laws which have been enacted by the Parliament, with assent from the President. These include the Factories Act, 1948, Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, Minimum Wages Act 1948, Payment of Wages Act,1936, and Employees State Insurance Act,1948.

All the aforementioned laws fall under subjects categorised in the concurrent list under the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution, listed from serial numbers 22 to 24, namely: “Trade unions; industrial and labour disputes”, “Social security and social insurance; employment and unemployment” and “Welfare of labour including conditions of work, provident funds, employers’ liability, workmen’s compensation, invalidity and old age pensions and maternity benefits”.

Thus, given the federal structure of the Constitution, states can make laws regarding these subjects, including amendments to existing ones. However, as the former judge pointed out, these amended laws must “be in obedience with the provisions of the... Central Acts which are already legislated by the Parliament.”

Else, there will be direct conflict between laws enacted by states and those by enacted by the Centre. Article 254(1) resolves such conflicts by clarifying that “If any provision of a law made by the Legislature of a State is repugnant to any provision of a law made by Parliament.. with respect to one of the matters enumerated in the Concurrent List, then... the law made by Parliament... shall prevail and the law made by the Legislature of the State shall, to the extent of the repugnancy, be void.”

The only exception made is in Article 254(2), in cases where such an Act passed by the state legislature, or an ordinance of the governor when the legislature is not in session, “has been reserved for the consideration of the President”, following which the latter has given assent. Even this exception is qualified by a proviso there should be nothing in its content which prevents the Parliament from scrapping or amending it.

Citing a long line of jurisprudence in favour of his argument, dating back to 1959, Justice Gowda concluded: “The Governor is not empowered to issue the Ordinance where the Bill is required to be reserved for assent of the President.”

Even in case the Karnataka Governor reserves the ordinance for presidential assent, the assent itself “is not automatic and should be with due application of mind, keeping in view the binding precedents... laid down by both Constitution Bench and other Benches”, he argued, stressing that the precedents set by these judgments are “binding on everybody including the President and the Governor.”

Get the latest reports & analysis with people's perspective on Protests, movements & deep analytical videos, discussions of the current affairs in your Telegram app. Subscribe to NewsClick's Telegram channel & get Real-Time updates on stories, as they get published on our website.
Labour laws
Ordinance
Karnataka
Governor
President of India
supreme court
Constitution of India
Related Stories
Working people

Life and Death of Working People in India

Economic Rationale of Slaughter and Beef Ban in Karnataka

Economic Rationale of Slaughter and Beef Ban in Karnataka

UP: With Dues Piling up, Sugarcane Farmers Await Prices for This Season

UP: With Dues Piling up, Sugarcane Farmers Await Prices for This Season

UNITE Protests ‘Unilateral’ Decision by Cognizant to Increase Work Hours

UNITE Protests ‘Unilateral’ Decision by Cognizant to Increase Work Hours

NITI Aayog Studying How Judges Can Help Economics Beat Environmental Concerns

NITI Aayog Studying How Judges Can Help Economics Beat Environmental Concerns

SC criticizes families’ rejection of inter-caste, inter-faith marriages; suggests counseling for police to manage such cases

SC Criticizes Families’ Rejection of Inter-caste, Inter-Faith Marriages; Suggests Counseling for Police to Manage Such Cases

Akhil Gogoi

Anti-CAA Protests Case: SC Denies Bail to Akhil Gogoi

SC Grants Shashi Tharoor, Senior Journalists Facing FIRs for Reports/Tweets Protection From Arrest

SC Grants Tharoor, Senior Journalists Facing FIRs for Reports/Tweets Protection From Arrest

SC throws out PIL seeking President’s rule in UP

SC Throws Out PIL Seeking President’s Rule in UP

Coal Mining in India

Meghalaya: Scourge of Illegal Coal Mining Persists Despite Ban

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share

Related Stories

Sabrang India

Handling of Electronic Evidence by Agencies a Perversion of Criminal Justice: CCG

06 March 2021
In a strongly worded statement responding to recent forensic reports that reveal the distinct possibility of outside planting and tampering of evid
The Leaflet

Marked ‘D’ on Electoral rolls, 26 Individuals Seek Removal of tag; SC Issues Notice to Centre, EC, Assam Govt

04 March 2021
THE Supreme Court Wednesday issued notice to the Central Government, Election Commission and the Assam Government on a petition fi
PTI

Bhima Koregaon Case: SC to Hear Bail Plea of Gautam Navlakha on Wednesday

01 March 2021
New Delhi: The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear on Wednesday the bail plea of activist Gautam Navlakha in the alleged Elgar Parishad-Maoist link

Pagination

  • Next page ››

More

  • Kerala Elections 2021: After 14 Elections, Women Still Under-represented in State Assembly

    Kerala Elections 2021: After 14 Elections, Women Still Under-represented in State Assembly

  • Singareni Coal Workers Start Indefinite Dharna Against Commercial Mining

    Singareni Coal Workers Start Indefinite Dharna Against Commercial Mining

  • Sugarcane Farmers.

    Farmers in Western UP Hold Protest Against Irregularities in Weighing of Sugarcane

  • Why a Weakening Gulf Stream Could Bring Extreme Weather Conditions

    Why a Weakening Gulf Stream Could Bring Extreme Weather Conditions

  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with
about