NewsClick

NewsClick
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Covid-19
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • International
  • Sports
  • Articles
  • Videos
search
menu

INTERACTIVE ELECTION MAPS

image/svg+xml
  • All Articles
  • Newsclick Articles
  • All Videos
  • Newsclick Videos
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • Sports
  • International
  • Africa
  • Latin America
  • Palestine
  • Nepal
  • Pakistan
  • Sri Lanka
  • US
  • West Asia
About us
Subscribe
Follow us Facebook - Newsclick Twitter - Newsclick RSS - Newsclick
close menu
×
For latest updates on nCOVID-19 around the world visit our INTERACTIVE COVID MAP
Law
Politics
India

Hyd Encounter: Why Police Cannot Give Itself a Clean Chit

Even for ‘national security’, the means matter more than the ends.
Prannv Dhawan, Bhaskar Kumar
08 Dec 2019
Hyd Encounter: Why Police Cannot

Image for representational use only.Image Courtesy : The Indian Express

The gruesome rape and murder of a woman in Hyderabad has revived the debate about women’s safety. People hit the streets in protest, demanding justice for the woman and questioning the system of policing across the country. Within a day, the police arrested the accused, and on the intervening night of 5 and 6 December, at around 3 AM, it shot them dead, and claimed it was an “encounter”.

The police version is that the accused were taken to the spot where crime took place in order to reconstruct how it took place, when the accused tried to escape from custody. The killing has got mixed responses from the public, with a great number hailing the modus operandi of the policemen and rejoicing at this form of justice. Some have questioned the shooting, calling it a murder in cold blood. The police’s methods have raised serious question about the human rights of accused persons, the impunity of police officials in fake encounters and the mysterious encounter in this case.

First of all, the rules require that all the accused would have to be handcuffed and taken out of lockup with adequate guards. How, then, were all four able to escape the custody of police at the same instant? If they were not handcuffed, then the blame would like with the police and questions about this must be posed to them. The second question is why the police chose to reconstruct the crime at 3 AM? In cases of encounters, where the accused persons were unarmed, how can the police justify their murder? What we still do not know is how far these men ran before they were fired upon. There is a very scant possibility that they would have run so far as to leave no choice but to be killed.

Even if we assume that the men ran a distance, this raises questions on the police as to what were they doing while the prisoners attempted their getaway? Third, again assuming that the accused tried to flee, it is settled law that in such cases the escorting policeman is permitted by law to use a firearm, but only to target the lower part of the body to immobilise them, to prevent them from absconding and not kill them.

The police, except in exercise of self-defense, cannot kill people in the name of “encounters”. Section 46(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), enacted in 1973, gives the police the power to arrest a person, but it does not empower it to cause death if the offence alleged against him or her is not punishable with death or life imprisonment. However, if a death does occur, the court would examine the facts during trial—the police cannot decide for itself.

Clearly, in the present case, even if the narrative of the police is presumed to be accurate, there was no justification to open fire in a manner which led to the death of the accused.

These facts and circumstances make it incumbent upon the state government to book all the police official involved in this “encounter”. In People’s Union for Civil Liberties vs State of Maharashtra the Supreme Court laid down 16 firm guidelines that must be followed during the investigation of police encounters which lead to deaths. These are the standard procedures set up to ensure a thorough, effective and independent investigation. The important guidelines are that an FIR must be registered and forwarded to the court under Section 157 of the Code without delay. While forwarding the report, the procedure prescribed under Section 158 of the Code is to be followed. There would have to be an independent investigation into the incident/encounter by the CID or police team from another police station, under the supervision of a senior officer (at least one level above the head of the police party engaged in the encounter).

Third, a magisterial inquiry must invariably be held in all cases of death in the course of police firing, under Section 176 of the Code. The report of this inquiry is to be sent to a judicial magistrate having jurisdiction under Section 190 of the Code. Fourth, it should be ensured that there is no delay in sending FIRs, diary entries, panchnamas, sketches, and so on, to the concerned court. Fifth, there is to be no out-of-turn promotion or instant gallantry rewards for the officers concerned soon after the occurrence. The Supreme Court also said that it must be ensured at all costs that such rewards are given or recommended only when the gallantry of the concerned officers is established beyond doubt.

It is high time India started talking about the police reform that have been pending for decades. Considering no one is questioning the role of law enforcement agencies and mechanisms in India, the question is, what else but reform can ensure that public faith in justice system does not wither away? The existing police system suffers from myriad deficiencies. From problems relating to police organisation, infrastructure and environment, to obsolete weaponry and intelligence-gathering techniques; to shortage of manpower and corruption, the country’s police force is not in good shape.

The existing police infrastructure is also inadequate to cater to the needs of the police force. There is a huge manpower shortage in police departments across the country. The result is overburdened police staff, a grave challenge for the force. Excessive work burdens do not just reduce the effectiveness and efficiency of police personnel but also leads to psychological distress, which contributes to various crimes committed by policemen.

In 2006, the Supreme Court also delivered the landmark Prakash Singh ruling, in which seven-point directives were issued to the Center and state governments. However, till date, this order has not been implemented. This reflects just how badly India lacks the political will to improve the police force and how adamant the bureaucracy is against implementing this order.

Just as the cold-blooded rape and murder of the victim in Hyderabad chills us to the bone, we must dread the killing, in mysterious circumstances, of the accused by the police. The uncritical endorsement of “encounters” is frightening, considering the impunity with which the Uttar Pradesh Police created an alarming situation in 2018. That year, on average, almost four encounters were reported every day in the state. Despite strong criticism by the National Human Rights Commission against open misuse of police power using the semi-undeclared endorsement from the state government.

Citizens must be critical of the hyper-nationalist narrative that is pushing us to be indifferent towards the means by which the ends of national security are achieved.

Prannv Dhawan and Bhaskar Kumar are students of NLSIU Bengaluru. Dhawan is the founding editor of the Law School Policy Review.

Get the latest reports & analysis with people's perspective on Protests, movements & deep analytical videos, discussions of the current affairs in your Telegram app. Subscribe to NewsClick's Telegram channel & get Real-Time updates on stories, as they get published on our website.
Police encounter
Hyderabad Police
Rape-murder in Hyderabad
Prakash Singh case
Police Reform
Supreme Court encounter ruling
Related Stories

Hyderabad: Death Penalty is No Cure for Rape Culture

Conviction Rates Remain Low, While Encounter 'Justice' Increases

NHRC Takes Cognizance of Hyderabad Encounter, Orders Probe

Hyderabad ‘Encounter’ Killings: NHRC Urged to Order Autopsy by Surgeons Outside Telangana, AP

Hyderabad ‘Encounter’ Killings: NHRC Urged to Order Autopsy by Surgeons Outside Telangana, AP

‘Encounter Politics’ Heats up in UP as Another Man is Killed in Azamgarh

lynching

How Indian States Can Stop Rampaging Lynch Mobs

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share

Related Stories

KS Subramanian

Human Rights and Police Reform: An Important but Neglected Report

08 July 2020
The violence in Northeast Delhi following the February election to the Delhi Assembly witnessed a large number of killings, mostly of Muslims.
Partha S. Ghosh

Who Will Guard the Guards?

21 June 2020
The brutal killing of George Floyd, an African-American, by the Minneapolis (Minnesota) Police Department has m
PTI

Hyderabad ‘Encounter’: Preserve Bodies of Slain Accused Till Dec 13, Orders HC

09 December 2019
Hyderabad: The Telangana High Court on Monday directed authorities to preserve the bodies of the four slain accused in the woman veterinarian case,

Pagination

  • Next page ››

More

  • 100 Former Civil Servants Raise Questions on Transparency in PM-CARES Fund

    100 Former Civil Servants Raise Questions on Transparency in PM-CARES Fund

  • bAgpat.

    Farmers' Protest: Western UP Khap Leaders Plan to Block Loni Border From January 17

  • Andhra Pradesh: Anantapur Farmers Protest Against Real Estate on Land Acquired for Industries

    Andhra Pradesh: Anantapur Farmers Protest Against Real Estate on Land Acquired for Industries

  • Too Little Too Late: Former MP on Chit Fund ‘Moghul’ KD Singh’s Arrest

    Too Little Too Late: Former MP on Chit Fund ‘Moghul’ KD Singh’s Arrest

  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with
about