NewsClick

NewsClick
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Covid-19
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • International
  • Sports
  • Articles
  • Videos
search
menu

INTERACTIVE ELECTION MAPS

image/svg+xml
  • All Articles
  • Newsclick Articles
  • All Videos
  • Newsclick Videos
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • Sports
  • International
  • Africa
  • Latin America
  • Palestine
  • Nepal
  • Pakistan
  • Sri Lanka
  • US
  • West Asia
About us
Subscribe
Follow us Facebook - Newsclick Twitter - Newsclick RSS - Newsclick
close menu
×
For latest updates on nCOVID-19 around the world visit our INTERACTIVE COVID MAP
Law
Politics
India

Sedition Law: State of Permanent Emergency?

In yet another case of silencing free speech through the use of sedition laws, two FIRs were filed against prominent journalist Vinod Dua for criticising the central government’s handling of Delhi riots.
Manu Bajaj
13 Jul 2020
Sedition law in India

Representational image. | Image Courtesy: The Leaflet

In yet another case of silencing free speech through the use of sedition laws, two FIRs were filed against prominent journalist Vinod Dua for criticising the central government’s handling of Delhi riots. The FIRs, filed by local BJP leaders, allege that Mr Dua incited hatred and violence towards the Prime Minister, and his government. Both the Delhi High Court, for the FIR registered in Delhi, and Supreme Court, for the FIR registered in Himachal Pradesh, have granted a stay on the arrest order while hearing Mr Dua’s plea seeking quashing of the FIRs. The author here examines the use of sedition laws on dissenters and critics of the government during the COVID-19 lockdown, in what he calls the imposition of a permanent emergency.

                                                                               ————

Recently, the apex court on July 7 granted interim protection to Mr. Vinod Dua, a leading journalist, charged with sedition due to his critique of the Government’s mishandling of the COVID-19 outbreak.

While hearing Mr. Dua petition for quashing of the FIR lodged against him, the Apex Court bench led by Hon’ble Justice Uday Umesh Lalit, directed the Himachal Pradesh Police to file a status report of the ongoing investigation within a week, to ascertain whether the FIR filed, was only to harass the senior journalist for airing views unpalatable to the Government.

Post lockdown, we have not only seen a spike in the number of COVID-19 patients, but another concern has re-surfaced which is weakening and undermining the fourth leg of our democracy.

Freedom of speech and expression, a cornerstone of the Indian democracy, has been put to a constant and continuous threat with the use of an archaic colonial law. The law on sedition, which is embodied in Section 124 A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), exists 73 years after independence, eroding the independence of the media, now more than ever. Section 124 A was inserted to the IPC during the colonial rule, to keep in check the growing turmoil of Indian masses against the British Raj. Since then the section has undergone multiple amendments, only to become more stringent and thwart the voice of dissent.

Section 124A of the IPC in its present form, reads “Whoever, by words, either spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise, brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards, the Government established by law in India, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, to which fine may be added, or with imprisonment which may extend to three years, to which fine may be added, or with fine.“

Sedition is a non-bailable offence and punishable with minimum imprisonment of up to three years to a maximum of life term, along with payment of fine. This law has been persistently misused by governing parties to suppress unpalatable views, dissenting opinions, and condemnation of government actions and/or policies. Even though chances of conviction in such cases are a rarity, it has served as an effective tool of harassment and intimidation, wielded to silent dissenters.

The present government, like the ones before it, is no different. Recently Mr. Nityanand Rai, the Minister of State for Home Affairs, on being asked whether the colonial law would be repealed, said in the Rajya Sabha that “there is no proposal to scrap the provision under IPC dealing with the offence of sedition. There is a need to retain the provision to effectively combat anti-national, secessionist and terrorist elements”.

This is despite the judiciary’s consistent upholding of every citizen’s right to fairly and justly criticize the inactions and inadequacies of the Government. The Supreme Court of India, in a landmark judgment of Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar (1962), had ruled that: “… citizen has a right to say or write whatever he likes about the Government, or its measures, by way of criticism or comment, so long as he does not incite people to violence against the  Government established by law or with the intention of creating public disorder.”

The demand to repeal the law on sedition is not new and has been advocated since pre- independence. Mahatma Gandhi in 1922, after being charged with sedition by the British Government for an article published in the local magazine had said “Section 124A, under which I am happily charged, is perhaps the prince among the political sections of the Indian Penal Code designed to suppress the liberty of a citizen”. J Nehru, democratic India’s first Prime Minister, had termed the draconian law as “obnoxious” and “highly objectionable” and had observed that “the sooner we get rid of it the better”.

Unfortunately, India even after being independent for 73 years has failed to repeal the law on sedition as ruling parties continue to use it as a weapon of suppressing dissent. India has been a recent witness to the unprecedented use of the sedition law during lockdown, when the law was used to mute voices questioning the failure of the Government and lack of preparedness while imposing lockdown.

This repeated and unscrupulous use of the sedition law has re-opened an essential debate; whether the law on sedition should be abolished or whether the voice of dissent will be left at the mercy of the ruling government. Ironically, even the United Kingdom, our colonial father, has abolished their law on sedition in 2010 following the recommendation of Britain’s Law Commission Report. Despite this, India continues to carry the colonial baggage of misery and oppression to its citizens. Unless India finds a way to put an end to this instrument of abuse, its citizens fundamental right remains in a state of permanent-emergency.

(The author is an advocate practicing at Delhi High Court and Supreme Court of India. Views expressed are personal.)

Courtesy: The Leaflet,
Original published date:
13 Jul 2020
Get the latest reports & analysis with people's perspective on Protests, movements & deep analytical videos, discussions of the current affairs in your Telegram app. Subscribe to NewsClick's Telegram channel & get Real-Time updates on stories, as they get published on our website.
Sedition
Attack on Freedom of Speech
Attack on Press Freedom
Vinod Dua
Emergency
Undeclared Emergency
Delhi riots 2020
Indian government
Indian Supreme Court
Related Stories
UAPA

Rights Organisations Demand Quashing of UAPA, Sedition Charges Against Activists

p&H hc

State Must be Circumspect in Invoking Sedition Laws, Says Punjab&Haryana HC; Grants Bail to Person Arrested for Anti-government Posts on Social Media

NIA Raids Show Govt’s Determination to Suppress Dissenting Voices in J&K: Amnesty International

NIA Raids Show Govt’s Determination to Suppress Dissenting Voices in J&K: Amnesty International

Freedom of speech

Freedom of Speech Being Eroded, Mauled Through Twisting and Turning Law: Justice Lokur

Freedom of speech

Freedom of Speech, Dissent and Sedition

Riots

From Asking About Sikhs Children Now Ask, Why Do We Kill Muslims?

False Claims, Factual Inaccuracies: Review of Delhi Riots Book

False Claims, Factual Inaccuracies: Review of Delhi Riots Book

Modi Govt Using State Resources to Keep Activists Behind Bars Amid Pandemic, Says New Report

Gauri Lankesh

Hum Dekhenge: Various Artists Come Together to Remember Gauri Lankesh

BJP’s Use of Sedition Law

Another Curve Fails to Flatten: BJP’s Use of Sedition Law

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share

Related Stories

Newsclick Report

Digital Media Organisations Condemn Manipur Journalists Being Detained, Slapped with UAPA

19 January 2021
The DIGIPUB News India Foundation has strongly condemned the Manipur police detaining two journalists under IPC Section 124A (Sedition) and also bo
M Sridhar Acharyulu

An Affront to Judicial Majesty that Confuses the People too

11 January 2021
Not long ago, Justice Rakesh Kumar of the Andhra Pradesh High Court is alleged to have said the following words: “How could the government auction
Ajaz Ashraf

Sharjeel Imam on How Not to Let Jail Break You

31 December 2020
Lawyer Ahmad Ibrahim had been worrying, for a good many weeks, about his client Sharjeel Imam, the PhD student of Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delh

Pagination

  • Next page ››

More

  • Normal Life Disrupted in Kashmir as Restriction, Shutdown Mark Republic Day

    Normal Life Disrupted in Kashmir as Restriction, Shutdown Mark Republic Day

  • Digital Right Organisations condemn internet shutdown in Delhi

    Digital Right Organisations Condemn Internet Shutdown in Delhi

  • Farmers’ Parade is a Fitting Reply

    “Farmers’ Parade is a Fitting Reply to Those Who Consider us Mutthi Bhar Log”

  • How Prepared Punjab Farmers Are for R-Day Tractor Parade

    Here is How Prepared Punjab Farmers Are for R-Day Tractor Parade

  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with
about