NewsClick

NewsClick
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Covid-19
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • International
  • Sports
  • Articles
  • Videos
search
menu

INTERACTIVE ELECTION MAPS

image/svg+xml
  • All Articles
  • Newsclick Articles
  • All Videos
  • Newsclick Videos
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • Sports
  • International
  • Africa
  • Latin America
  • Palestine
  • Nepal
  • Pakistan
  • Sri Lanka
  • US
  • West Asia
About us
Subscribe
Follow us Facebook - Newsclick Twitter - Newsclick RSS - Newsclick
close menu
×
For latest updates on nCOVID-19 around the world visit our INTERACTIVE COVID MAP
Politics
International

Third World Quarterly and a False Case for Colonialism

In an article by Bruce Gilley titled ‘The case for Colonialism’, in Third World Quarterly, he not only claimed that Colonialism was good, but he went on to argue that we need a new program for colonialism.
Leftword Blog
22 Sep 2017
TWQ

twq

Last week, Third World Quarterly, a development studies journal, published an article by Bruce Gilley titled ‘The case for Colonialism.’ In his piece, Gilley not only claimed that Colonialism was good, but he went on to argue that we need a new program for colonialism. The publication of this article was followed by the protests against it by numerous scholars and members of the editorial board of the Third World Quarterly journal. A change.org petition asking for the retraction of the article has more than 10,000 signatures as of now. Today, 16 members of the International Editorial Board of the journal resigned after the journal issued an untruthful response and didn’t retract the piece. In their statement, the members of the board said that,

“We are deeply disappointed by the unacceptable process around the publication of Bruce Gilley’s Viewpoint essay, ‘The case for colonialism,’ which was published in Third World Quarterly without any consultation with the Editorial Board. As International Editorial Board Members, we were told in an email on September 15 from Shahid Qadir that this piece was put through the required double-blind peer review process. We asked for these reviews to be sent to the Editorial Board, and they were not.”

“We fully disagree with both the academic content of the Viewpoint and the response issued in the name of the journal; we are forced to resign immediately from the Editorial Board of Third World Quarterly.”

In the debates that followed the publication of the essay, two things have come up. The first is that if the journal should have published the piece or not. Vijay Prashad, one of the members of the International Editorial Board, explained the history of the Third World Quarterly in a twitter thread. He writes,

“The journal was started as an intellectual venue for the anti-colonial thought, to build ideas against colonialism. The values of the journal are rooted in the era after colonialism but when imperialism remained; to have an imperialist essay in a journal with this history is the abomination. Third World Quarterly is the home of the Third World Prize, the Edward Said Prize; the home, in other words, of values against this essay.”

The journal in its statement has said that Gilley’s article went through the double-blind peer review process and hence the publication is justified. But, the members of the editorial board have found out that the reviewers who initially examined the piece rejected it and found it unfit to be sent for additional peer review. Further, the essay has also been criticised by other scholars for lacking empirical evidence and for its historical inaccuracies. The journal must answer why it still chose to go ahead with the publication of the article.

The second is that in asking for the retraction of the piece if we are curbing the freedom of speech of the writer of the article; this is not that complicated an issue as it sounds. The freedom of speech doesn’t guarantee that every person should get a mainstream platform to publish their views. In the case of Third World Quarterly, the content is held to a certain standard and when the essay by Gilley failed to provide reliable findings, it should, to maintain the norms the journal subscribes to, not have been published by the journal in the first place. Now that it has been published, the retraction and a formal explanation is the only way forward for the journal.

The question of the censorship and freedom of speech would have arisen if the people who are protesting against the article had asked for a total ban on the publication of the said essay. Gilley will find suitable people who would gladly publish his essay without even caring for the review process. There are popular right-wing online websites dedicated just to this task. This is not the first time that any scholar has made an argument in praise of the colonialism, nor it is the first time when colonialism lovers have appeared in the public spaces.  In a YouGov poll in 2014, more than 50% people in the UK said that they are proud of the British Empire and Colonialism has done more good than bad in the colonies. The ‘censorship’ narrative is a false narrative that the right-wing loves to create when it gets criticised in the public domain. Portia Roelogs and Max Gallien, in a piece for LSE Impact blog, have tried to analyze the click-bait aspect to such essays. In their opinion piece, they have sought to illustrate that the deliberately provocative articles such as Gilley’s essay, influence academia; the focus on the clicks and views takes the front seat and the rigour research that should be must for any publication loses the game.

I would like to conclude by saying that it was totally wrong on the part of Third World Quarterly that it published such a shoddy essay; only way forward for them is the retraction of the piece. The academia, on the other hand, can choose to either ignore the essay or as a few have already done it, remind the readers that the colonialism was bad and any case for colonialism would require a false version of the history.

Courtesy: Leftword Blog,
Original published date:
21 Sep 2017
Get the latest reports & analysis with people's perspective on Protests, movements & deep analytical videos, discussions of the current affairs in your Telegram app. Subscribe to NewsClick's Telegram channel & get Real-Time updates on stories, as they get published on our website.
Colonialism
Anti Colonialism
Protest
Imperialism
Third World Quarterly
Related Stories
Punjab farmers' rail bloackade

Rail Blockade in Punjab: Farmers’ Bodies Stick to Demands, Talks with Centre Remain ‘Inconclusive’

andhra protest

Andhra: Garment Workers in Anantapur’s Indian Designs Company Protest for Minimum Wages

2000 ASHAs Detained in AP during Protest Demanding Implementation of NHM Norms

2000 ASHAs Detained in AP during Protest Demanding Implementation of NHM Norms

nellore

AP: Unpaid for 3 Months, Nellore Municipal Workers Protest, Demand Payment of Salaries

Many gathered in Himachal Pradesh's Shimla as part of the countrywide protest, jointly called by workers' and peasants' groups. Image Courtesy - Special Arrangement.

Hathras Case: CITU, AIKS Hold Protests, Demand SC-Monitored Probe

German imperialism & European ambitions beyond NATO

German Imperialism & European Ambitions Beyond NATO

Andhra: Thousands of Textile Workers in Texport Industries in Hindupur on Strike Demanding Minimum Wages

Andhra: Thousands of Textile Workers in Texport Industries in Hindupur on Strike Demanding Minimum Wages

Unpaid for 3 Months and Struggling to Survive, Maharashtra Transport Employees to Launch Protest

Unpaid for 3 Months and Struggling to Survive, Maharashtra Transport Employees to Launch Protest

Farmers to intensify protest against reforms

Delhi Chalo Call, Social Boycott of BJP Leaders: Farmers to Intensify Protests Against Reforms

Farmers Take to Streets Against Controversial Farm Bills

Farmers Take to Streets Against Controversial Farm Bills

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share

Related Stories

Ronak Chhabra

Haryana: In Solidarity With Farmers, Workers Gherao DC Offices in All Districts

12 January 2021
Days after farmers forced Haryana Chief Minister Manohar Lal Khattar to cancel a public event in his own constituency, workers’ organisations ensur
Ronak Chhabra

Few, But Strong: The Women Farmers at Rajasthan-Haryana Border

21 December 2020
Shahjahanpur/Alwar: All day and night long, Shubhita Nehra’s time is consumed by chores -- feeding the ho
Ronak Chhabra

‘Delhi Chalo’: Punjab Farmers Refuse to Blink First on Train Shutdown

19 November 2020
At a meeting attended by 30 farmers’ organisations at Chandigarh’s Kisan Bhawan on Wednesday, it was decided that a “positive decision”

Pagination

  • Next page ››

More

  • 100 Former Civil Servants Raise Questions on Transparency in PM-CARES Fund

    100 Former Civil Servants Raise Questions on Transparency in PM-CARES Fund

  • bAgpat.

    Farmers' Protest: Western UP Khap Leaders Plan to Block Loni Border From January 17

  • Andhra Pradesh: Anantapur Farmers Protest Against Real Estate on Land Acquired for Industries

    Andhra Pradesh: Anantapur Farmers Protest Against Real Estate on Land Acquired for Industries

  • Too Little Too Late: Former MP on Chit Fund ‘Moghul’ KD Singh’s Arrest

    Too Little Too Late: Former MP on Chit Fund ‘Moghul’ KD Singh’s Arrest

  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with
about