Skip to main content
xYOU DESERVE INDEPENDENT, CRITICAL MEDIA. We want readers like you. Support independent critical media.

‘Contempt Proceedings Against Prashant Bhushan Seem an Attempt at Stifling Criticism’,

Former judges, civil servants, academics among over 130 citizens issue solidarity statement, appeal to SC.
Prashant Bhushan

Prashant Bhushan. Image Courtesy: Business Standard

Ahead of the hearing of two contempt cases against Advocate Prashant Bhushan in the Supreme Court on August 4 and 5, members of the civil society on Monday released a statement expressing solidarity with Bhushan. 

While one of the cases refers to a statement from 2009 when he had told Tehelka that half of the 16 CJIs had been corrupt, the other case rests on his recent tweets criticising the CJI and the apex court. Even as the tweets have been "withheld" by Twitter now, according to Firstpost, one statement was about the impropriety of the present Chief Justice of India being seen riding a Harley Davidson motorcycle belonging to a BJP leader in Nagpur and the other one was about the “undeclared emergency” in India where Bhushan suggested that the Supreme Court had a role in ensuring it stayed that way.

In this context, the statement that lists 131 signatories, including retired SC judge Madan B Lokur, former Delhi High Court judge AP Shah, author Arundhati Roy, activist Bezwada Wilson, former ambassadors and several retired bureaucrats, said: “In the past few years, serious questions have been raised about the reluctance of the Supreme Court to play its constitutionally mandated role as a check on governmental excesses and violations of fundamental rights of people by the state. These questions have been raised by all sections of society- media, academics, civil society organisations, members of the legal fraternity and even by sitting and retired judges of the Supreme Court itself. Most recently, the Supreme Court’s reluctance to intervene in a timely manner to avert the migrant crisis during the lockdown came under intense public scrutiny.”

It said that Bhushan had articulated some of these concerns in his tweets and the case against him appears to be an attempt at stifling such criticism.

“Even in India, the principle that criticism of the judiciary should not be stifled by the indiscriminate use of the power of contempt has been recognized by the Supreme Court as well as by academics and advocates of repute, such as the late Senior Advocate Shri Vinod A. Bobde who had stated [“Scandals and Scandalising”, (2003) 8 SCC Jour 32], ‘We cannot countenance a situation where citizens live in fear of the Court’s arbitrary power to punish for contempt for words of criticism on the conduct of judges, in or out of court.’,” it added.

Read the full statement below:  

Statement in solidarity with Mr. Prashant Bhushan on the initiation of Criminal Contempt Proceedings against him

We the undersigned citizens of the country, express our concern with the initiation of contempt proceedings against human right activist and advocate, Mr. Prashant Bhushan, by the Supreme Court of India, in respect of two of his tweets. Mr. Bhushan has been a relentless crusader for the rights of the weakest sections of our society and has spent his career in pro bono legal service to those who do not have ready access to justice. He has fought cases at the Apex Court on issues ranging from environmental protection, human rights, civil liberties, corruption in high places and has been an outspoken champion for judicial accountability and reforms, especially in the higher judiciary.

In the past few years, serious questions have been raised about the reluctance of the Supreme Court to play its constitutionally mandated role as a check on governmental excesses and violations of fundamental rights of people by the state. These questions have been raised by all sections of society- media, academics, civil society organisations, members of the legal fraternity and even by sitting and retired judges of the Supreme Court itself. Most recently, the Supreme Court’s reluctance to intervene in a timely manner to avert the migrant crisis during the lockdown came under intense public scrutiny. Concerns have also been raised regarding the decision of the court to not restart physical hearings, even in a limited manner, despite passage of five months since the onset of the COVID pandemic.

We urge the Hon’ble judges of the Supreme Court to take note of these concerns and engage with the public in an open and transparent manner. The initiation of contempt proceedings against Mr. Bhushan who had articulated some of  these concerns in his tweets, appears to be an attempt at stifling such criticism, not just by Prashant Bhushan but by all stakeholders in the Indian democratic and constitutional setup. We believe the institution must address these genuine concerns.

An institution as important as the Supreme Court of a country must be open to public discussion without the fear of retribution or action of criminal contempt. Indeed, criminal contempt as an offence has been circumscribed and made redundant in most functioning democracies, such as the USA and the UK. In the landmark U.S. Supreme Court judgement in New York Times v. L.B. Sullivan 11 L’ed (2nd) 686,  with respect to contempt of court and the freedom of speech and expression it was held: “Injury to official reputation affords no more warrant for repressing speech that would otherwise be free than does factual error. Where judicial officers are involved, this Court has held that concern for the dignity and reputation of the courts does not justify the punishment as criminal contempt of criticism of the judge or his decision. This is true even though the utterance contains “half-truth” and misinformation”.

Even in India, the principle that criticism of the judiciary should not be stifled by the indiscriminate use of the power of contempt has been recognized by the Supreme Court as well as by academics and advocates of repute, such as the late Senior Advocate Shri Vinod A. Bobde who had stated [“Scandals and Scandalising”, (2003) 8 SCC Jour 32], “We cannot countenance a situation where citizens live in fear of the Court’s arbitrary power to punish for contempt for words of criticism on the conduct of judges, in or out of court.” 

Therefore in the interest of  justice and fairness and to maintain the dignity of the Supreme Court of India, we urge the Court to reconsider its decision to initiate suo-moto contempt proceedings against Mr. Prashant Bhushan and to withdraw the same at the earliest.

Endorsed by:

  1. Justice Madan B. Lokur, Former judge of the Supreme Court of India

  2. Justice AP Shah, Former Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court

  3. A. Selvaraj, IRS (Retd.), Former Chief Commissioner, Income Tax, Chennai, GoI

  4. Aakar Patel

  5. Achin Vanaik, writer and social activist, former professor at the University of Delhi

  6. Admiral Ramdas, Former Chief of Naval Staff

  7. Ajit Ranade, economist

  8. Alok Perti, IAS (Retd.), Former Secretary, Ministry of Coal, GoI

  9. Aloke B. Lal, IPS (Retd.), Former Director General (Prosecution), Govt. of Uttarakhand

  10. Amit Bhaduri, former Professor Emeritus at Jawaharlal Nehru University

  11. Amit Singh Chadha, Senior advocate

  12. Amitabha Pande, IAS (Retd.), Former Secretary, Inter-State Council, GoI

  13. Anand Grover, Senior advocate

  14. Anjali Bhardwaj, Social activist

  15. Annie Namala, Social activist

  16. Annie Raja, NFIW

  17. Ardhendu Sen, IAS (Retd.), Former Chief Secretary, Govt. of West Bengal

  18. Aruna Roy, Social activist

  19. Arundhati Dhuru, NAPM

  20. Arundhati Roy, Author

  21. Ashok Khosla, environmentalist

  22. Ashok Kumar Sharma, IFoS (Retd.), Former MD, State Forest Development Corporation, Govt. of Gujarat

  23. Ashok Kumar Sharma, IFS (Retd.), Former Ambassador to Finland and Estonia

  24. Bezwada Wilson, Safai Karamchari Andolan

  25. Bobby Ramakant, Socialist Party (India)

  26. Brinda Karat, CPI(M)

  27. C. U. Singh, senior advocate

  28. Chandrashekhar Balakrishnan, IAS (Retd.), Former Secretary, Coal, GoI

  29. D. Raja, General Secretary CPI

  30. Deb Mukharji, IFS (Retd.), Former High Commissioner to Bangladesh and former Ambassador to Nepal

  31. Deepak Nayyar, Emeritus Professor of Economics, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi

  32. Devika Singh, Social Activist

  33. Dipa Sinha, Right to Food Campaign

  34. Dr Dharamvira Gandhi,, Punjab Manch and former Lok Sabha member from Patiala

  35. EAS Sarma, Former Secretary to GOI

  36. Enakshi Ganguly, Co- Founder and Advisor, HAQ Centre for Child Rights

  37. Fabian K.P,

  38. Fr. Cedric Prakash SJ, human rights activist

  39. G. Balachandhran, IAS (Retd.), Former Additional Chief Secretary, Govt. of West Bengal

  40. G.G. Parikh, Freedom Fighter

  41. Ganesh Devy, National President, Rashtra Seva Dal

  42. Gopal Shankarnarayan, senior advocate

  43. Gopalan Balagopal, IAS (Retd.), Former Special Secretary, Govt. of West Bengal

  44. Harsh Mander, social activst

  45. Henri Tiphagne, Executive Director, People’s Watch and National Working Secretary, Human Rights Defenders’ Alert – India ( HRDA)

  46. Hindal Tyabji, IAS (Retd.), Former Chief Secretary rank, Govt. of Jammu & Kashmir

  47. Indira Jaising, senior advocate

  48. Jagdeep Chhokar, former Professor, Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad

  49. Javed Anand, Journalist and civil rights activist

  50. Jayati Ghosh, Professor, Jawaharlal Nehru University

  51. Jean Dreze, Economist

  52. Julio Ribeiro, IPS (Retd.), Former Adviser to Governor of Punjab & former Ambassador to Romania

  53. K. John Koshy, IAS (Retd.), Former State Chief Information Commissioner, West Bengal

  54. K. Saleem Ali, IPS (Retd.), Former Special Director, CBI, GoI

  55. Kalyani Chaudhuri, IAS (Retd.), Former Additional Chief Secretary, Govt. of West Bengal

  56. Kamal Jaswal, Former Secretary to Govt of India, Department of Information Technology 

  57. Kamayani Swami, NAPM, Bihar 

  58. Kamla Bhasin, Social Activist

  59. Kavita Krishnan, AIPWA 

  60. Kavitha Kuruganti, social activist

  61. Lalita Ramdas, Peace, Human Rights anti-nuclear Activist

  62. Lubna Sarwath, Socialist Party (India)

  63. M.G. Devasahayam, IAS (Retd.), Former Secretary, Govt. of Haryana

  64. M.Y. Rao, IAS (Retd.)   

  65. Madhu Bhaduri, IFS (Retd.), Former Ambassador to Portugal

  66. Mahadev Vidrohi, President, Sarva Seva Sangh

  67. Manoj Mitta, Author & Journalist

  68. Martin Macwan, Dalit human rights activist

  69. Medha Patkar, Social activist

  70. Meena Gupta, IAS (Retd.), Former Secretary, Ministry of Environment & Forests, GoI

  71. Meera Sanghamitra, Member, National Convening Committee, NAPM

  72. Mihir Desai, Senior advocate

  73. Mrinal Pande, Journalist and author

  74. N. Ram, former Editor-in-Chief, The Hindu

  75. N.C. Saxena, IAS (Retd.), Former Secretary, Planning Commission, GoI

  76. Nagalsamy, IA&AS (Retd.), Former Principal Accountant General, Tamil Nadu & Kerala

  77. Najeeb Jung, IAS (Retd.), Former Lieutenant Governor, Delhi

  78. Navrekha Sharma, IFS (Retd.), Former Ambassador to Indonesia

  79. Neeraj Jain, Lokayat, Associate Editor, Janata

  80. Nikhil Dey, Social activist

  81. Noor Mohammad, IAS (Retd.), Former Secretary, National Disaster Management Authority, GoI

  82. P. Sainath, Journalist and author

  83. P.K. Lahiri, IAS (Retd.), Former Executive Director, Asian Development Bank

  84. P.R. Dasgupta, IAS (Retd.), Former Chairman, Food Corporation of India, GoI

  85. Pamela Philipose, Journalist

  86. Paranjoy Guha Thakurta, Author & journalist

  87. Paul Divakar, National Campaign on Dalit Human Rights

  88. Prabhat Patnaik, Emeritus Professor, Jawaharlal Nehru University

  89. Prabir Purkayastha

  90. Pradeep K. Deb, IAS (Retd.), Former Secretary, Deptt. Of Sports, GoI

  91. Pradeep Nandrajog, Senior advocate

  92. Prakash Singh, former Police Chief, DG BSF,DGP UP & DGP Assam

  93. Pranab S. Mukhopadhyay, IAS (Retd.), Former Director, Institute of Port Management, GoI

  94. Prof. Alok Rai, Allahabad

  95. Prof. Manoj Kumar Jha, Member of Parliament, Rajya Sabha

  96. R. Poornalingam, IAS (Retd.), Former Secretary, Ministry of Textiles, GoI

  97. Rahul Khullar, IAS (Retd.), Former Chairman, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India

  98. Rajeev Bhargava, Professor, CSDS, Delhi

  99. Rajmohan Gandhi, Historian and Professor

  100. Rajni Bakshi, Journalist and author

  101. Raju Sharma, IAS (Retd.), Former Member, Board of Revenue, Govt. of UP

  102. Ramachandra Guha, Historian and writer

  103. Ravi Chopra, People's Science Institute

  104. Ravi Vira Gupta, IAS (Retd.), Former Deputy Governor, Reserve Bank of India

  105. Reetika Khera, economist

  106. S.R. Hiremath, Founder President, Samaj Parivartana Samudaya (SPS), Dharwad

  107. Sandeep Pandey, Socialist Party (India)

  108. Sanjay Bhasin

  109. Sanjay Hegde, Senior advocate

  110. Satish Deshpande, Professor of Sociology, Delhi University

  111. Sevanti Ninan, Journalist and researcher

  112. Shafi Alam, IPS (Retd.), Former Director General, NCRB, GoI

  113. Shailesh Gandhi, Former Information Commissioner of CIC

  114. Shantha Sinha, Former Chairperson NCPCR

  115. Sharad Behar, IAS (Retd.), Former Chief Secretary, Govt. of Madhya Pradesh

  116. Sonalini Mirchandani, IFS (Resigned), GoI

  117. Subhasis Bandyopadhyay, IIEST, Shibpur

  118. Subodh Lal, IPoS (Resigned), Former Deputy Director General, Ministry of  Communications, GoI

  119. Sundar Burra, IAS (Retd.), Former Secretary, Govt. of Maharashtra

  120. Surabhi Agarwal, Socialist Party (India)

  121. Suresh K. Goel, IFS (Retd.), Former Director General, ICCR, GoI

  122. Syeda Hameed, Former member, Planning Commission

  123. Teesta Setalvad, Civil rights activist

  124. V.P. Raja, IAS (Retd.), Former Chairman, MERC

  125. Vandana Shiva, Scientist, RFSTE

  126. Vijaya Latha Reddy, IFS (Retd.), Former Deputy National Security Adviser, GoI

  127. Vipul Mudgal, Activist and media scholar

  128. Vivek Mukherjee, Assistant Professor & Faculty Coordinator, NALSAR

  129. Vrinda Grover, Advocate

  130. Wajahat Habibullah, Former Chief Information Commissioner of CIC

  131. Yogendra Yadav, Swaraj India

Get the latest reports & analysis with people's perspective on Protests, movements & deep analytical videos, discussions of the current affairs in your Telegram app. Subscribe to NewsClick's Telegram channel & get Real-Time updates on stories, as they get published on our website.

Subscribe Newsclick On Telegram

Latest