NewsClick

NewsClick
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Covid-19
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • International
  • Sports
  • Articles
  • Videos
search
menu

INTERACTIVE ELECTION MAPS

image/svg+xml
  • All Articles
  • Newsclick Articles
  • All Videos
  • Newsclick Videos
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • Sports
  • International
  • Africa
  • Latin America
  • Palestine
  • Nepal
  • Pakistan
  • Sri Lanka
  • US
  • West Asia
About us
Subscribe
Follow us Facebook - Newsclick Twitter - Newsclick RSS - Newsclick
close menu
×
For latest updates on nCOVID-19 around the world visit our INTERACTIVE COVID MAP
sports
India

BCCI Cricket Advisory Committee: To Be or Not to Be, That’s the Conflict | On the Ball

Created in 2015 as an independent body with an advisory role on all things cricket, BCCI’s Cricket Advisory Committee (Sachin Tendulkar, Sourav Ganguly and VVS Laxman) has seen its role diminished to the point of being a glorified selection panel. Now, with a fresh ‘conflict of interest’ controversy bringing the members into the spotlight, perhaps it’s time to put an end to the paper tiger, writes R Kaushik in his column, On the Ball.
R Kaushik
27 Apr 2019
BCCI Cricket Advisory Committee: Sourav Ganguly, VVS Laxman, Sachin Tendulkar

BCCI’s Cricket Advisory Committee (CAC), comprising of Indian cricket legends Sourav Ganguly, VVS Laxman and Sachin Tendulkar, was the brainchild of Jagmohan Dalmiya and took shape in 2015.

So, the Cricket Advisory Committee (CAC) still exists. Or, at least, a downsized version of it, following Sourav Ganguly’s resignation from the body a little while back. Unfortunately, its continued existence came to light only when Justice DK Jain, the Ombudsman of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), who is temporarily doubling up as the Ethics Officer too, sent a notice to Sachin Tendulkar and VVS Laxman. The notice sought a reply to a complaint of conflict of interest received from a life member of the Madhya Pradesh Cricket Association, citing their involvement with different franchises in the Indian Premier League (IPL) as mentors.

We’ll come to the conflict of interest imbroglio later. First, to the CAC itself, and how a body comprising three of India’s greatest cricketers is reduced to a selection panel of sorts.

The CAC was the brainchild of Jagmohan Dalmiya, and took shape in June 2015 when he returned as the BCCI president, with Anurag Thakur as the secretary. Under the CAC’s ambit originally was a wide range of important issues — to suggest ways of improving the away performances of the senior team, to facilitate the seamless progression of promising talent from the Under-19 to the national side via the India ‘A’ route, to improve the stock of spin resources, to strike a balance between the three formats of the game, and to educate and offer life-skill support for the young guns.

Read More | Democratic Structure in BCCI Reforms Weakened by SC Order: Justice Lodha

It was the thrill of these challenges, and the opportunity to remain involved in the game in a meaningful capacity post-retirement, that encouraged the trio to readily agree to embrace their new responsibility, strictly in an honorary capacity which they themselves advocated. They met Dalmiya and Thakur, as well as the late Dr. MV Sridhar, then the general manager (cricket operations) and Prof. Ratnakar Shetty, at the time GM (game development), on June 6, 2015 in Kolkata to discuss the areas that needed immediate attention. That first meeting, as it turned out, was also the last one of that nature.

Gradually marginalized, the CAC was pulled out of cold storage in June 2016 to pick the head coach of the senior side. After an exhaustive selection process, Anil Kumble was their choice. The first signs that their suggestions weren’t necessarily binding came when the former Indian skipper was appointed for a one-year period despite the three-member panel recommending a three-year term until the end of the 2019 ICC World Cup.

Read More | Elections Without Constitution: DDCA and Delhi Cricket's Latest Controversy

For the next year, the CAC was a forgotten entity. It wasn’t until, at the insistence of the Committee of Administrators (CoA) tasked with overseeing the running of the BCCI, they were asked to identify the new coach at the end of Kumble’s one-year tenure that everyone realised the body wasn’t defunct. Their protestations that there was no need to go through the process again because they had in any case recommended a three-year tenure for Kumble and nothing had changed in the interim for them to change their mind was countered by claims that the CoA was particular that ‘due procedure’ be followed. After a series of meetings, including with Virat Kohli who expressed reservations about Kumble’s style of functioning, the CAC stuck by the ace leggie, who then decided that he had had enough and stepped down at the end of the Champions Trophy in June 2017.

After another comprehensive exercise, the CAC went for Ravi Shastri, the director of the team between 2014 and 2016, as the head coach for a two-year period. They also named Rahul Dravid, the India ‘A’ and Under-19 coach, as batting consultant, and Zaheer Khan as bowling consultant, only for overseas Test tours. However, the CAC were deemed to have ‘exceeded their brief’ in identifying support for Shastri, and even though the BCCI issued a press release clarifying that Dravid and Zaheer would be part of the set-up on away tours as and when the team needed them, we all know how that panned out.

Video | India to Host FIFA Under-17 Women’s World Cup; But Do Women Get to Play?

"You will be well aware that we put our heart and soul into the process, approaching a task made delicate by the recent developments with a clear head and with the sole aim of providing the Indian team with the best resources possible to become the world beaters they are capable of being,” the CAC had written to the BCCI at the time.

"It has both pained and disappointed us therefore to see the light in which CAC has been portrayed in various sections of the media. While we all know that none of these reports are true, it is out in public domain and the average cricket fan will in good faith believe them.” It was almost incredulous that men of such stature had to defend themselves against concerted mud-slinging.

Interestingly, the CAC was not involved in the selection of the India ‘A’ coach, and were forced to excuse themselves from their last two assignments due to the short notice at which they were asked to discharge their responsibilities last year. In the first case, they were tasked with picking two junior national selectors from a short-list; in the second, they had just over a day’s time to agree to be part of the panel to decide on the India Women coach in December. Given the paucity of time and prior commitments, the three batting greats expressed their inability to be part of the process.

It was also in December that they had written to the Committee of Administrators seeking clarity on their roles and responsibilities. That mail has elicited no reply till date. Since Dalmiya’s untimely and unfortunate demise, the CAC is a baby no one has any time or need for, except when it’s coach ki khoj hour.

Which begs the question — did Tendulkar, Ganguly and Laxman err on the side of caution? Should they have been more strident in their demands for role-clarity? And, were they wary about being branded selfish, self-absorbed and prima donnas had they said enough was enough and walked out of the CAC in a huff? The answer to all three questions is most likely an emphatic ‘yes’. They took on a new assignment and were determined to see it through, no matter the obstacles in their way. But once they realised they had reached a point of no-return, they will believe now with the benefit of hindsight, they should have called it quits with a public indictment of a system that, instead of celebrating their commitment, had walked the exact opposite path.

Read More | Elections 2019: Why , Vijender Singh and Gautam Gambhir Both Deserve To Lose

It is almost laughable, against this backdrop, that Tendulkar and Laxman are today being asked to reply to a conflict of interest complaint. These were the men, along with other giants of their time, who worked tirelessly on the field to regain the trust and confidence of disgruntled fans in the aftermath of the match-fixing scandal of 2000. As a cleverer friend quipped, the BCCI have shown no interest in the CAC, yet they are quick to seize on a conflict. And, given that the BCCI were the ones who appointed these gentlemen in the first place, it is bounden on them too to reply to the conflict notice.

Then again, rules are rules. Conflict of interest is a matter of perception as much as it is about the rules; in that sense, it is a bit like the spirit of sport. The argument that, despite being mentors in the IPL, they are in no position to make any decisions of influence as CAC members could be offset by the revised BCCI constitution of last year. Tendulkar and Laxman will no doubt reply to the notice by the stipulated April 28 deadline. No one can blame them if they welcome this opportunity for an out. Perhaps, a ‘thanks for nothing, and goodbye’ won’t be the worst response.

(Kaushik is a veteran cricket writer who has reported on over 100 Tests. He co-authored VVS Laxman's autobiography '281 and Beyond'.)

Read more sports stories from Newsclick

Get the latest reports & analysis with people's perspective on Protests, movements & deep analytical videos, discussions of the current affairs in your Telegram app. Subscribe to NewsClick's Telegram channel & get Real-Time updates on stories, as they get published on our website.
Indian cricket
Indian cricket committee
BCCI
BCCI Cricket Advisory Committee
Cricket Advisory Committee
BCCI CAC
CAC
Sachin Tendulkar
VVS Laxman
Sourav Ganguly
CAC conflict of interest
Sachin Tendulkar conflict of interest
Ganguly conflict of interest
Laxman conflict of interest
Mumbai Indians
Sunrisers Hyderabad
Indian Premier League
IPL
Cricket Association of Bengal
CAB
Jagmohan Dalmiya
Justice DK Jain
Anil Kumble
Virat Kohli
Indian cricket team
2019 ICC World Cup
Ravi Shastri
Related Stories
BCCI, AIFF, and the game of thrones in Indian sport

Is the Real Game in Indian Sport Being Played in Courtrooms and Not Stadiums?

Virat Kohli and Ben Stokes

Full Fledged England Tour of India Early Next year, Says Sourav Ganguly; No Plans Yet for Women and Domestic Cricket

Trent Alexander Arnold of Liverpool FC injured

Premier League Clubs Express Concern Over Three Substitution Ruling; Lack of Investment in Women’s Game Disgraceful: Megan Rapinoe and More (Football Round-up)

Indian cricket team's Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma

Australia vs India: Virat Kohli to Go on Paternity Leave After 1st Test; Rohit Sharma in Squad

Smriti Mandhana, Harmanpreet Kaur and Mithali Raj, the skippers of the three teams in the IPL Women's T20 Challenge

Desert Mirage: Indian Women Cricketers’ Four-Day Long 2020 Season Begins in UAE

BCCI apex council meeting

BCCI to Discuss Domestic Season and Home Series Against England In October 17 Meeting

Kamlesh Nagarkoti and Shivam Mavi of the KKR

Boys Interrupted: Shivam Mavi, Kamlesh Nagarkoti and the Tough Road to the Top

Rahul Tewatia

Let’s Talk: Rahul Tewatia Faces Brickbats and Then Bouquets

Can CSK reach the IPL playoffs - cartoon

'Deliver Us, Dear Sonu'

rabada

Kings XI Appeal Umpiring Error That Resulted in Loss to Delhi Capitals

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share

Related Stories

Newsclick Production

Let's Talk: Notes on and from Bio-Bubbles

05 January 2021
In this episode, we talk to Newsclick's Leslie Xavier on the recent controversy over reports of Indian cricket players breaking the bio-bubble in A
Newsclick Sports

BCCI President Sourav Ganguly Suffers Heart Attack, Undergoes Angioplasty

02 January 2021
BCCI president Sourav Ganguly suffered a “mild” heart attack and is undergoing “primary angioplasty” in Kolkata
Rishab Lingam

Why is Paternity Leave a Low Priority in Cricket?

27 December 2020
Virat Kohli’s paternity leave is unlikely to change the scenario for other sportspersons who still have to struggle for paternity and maternity

Pagination

  • Next page ››

More

  • NetaJi

    ‘Jai Shri Ram’ Slogans Mar Netaji‘s 125 Birth Anniversary Event in Kolkata

  • tractor parade 26.

    Delhi Police Allows Tractor Parade on Jan 26; Route Details to be Decided, Say Farmer Leaders

  • Larry King, Broadcasting Icon for Half-Century, dies at 87

    Larry King, Broadcasting Icon for Half-Century, Dies at 87

  • ‘Refused Police Jobs Despite Domicile Certificate,’ Claim West Pakistan Refugees in J&K, Launch Protest

    ‘Refused Police Jobs Despite Domicile Certificate,’ Claim West Pakistan Refugees in J&K, Launch Protest

  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with
about