NewsClick

NewsClick
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Covid-19
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • International
  • Sports
  • Articles
  • Videos
search
menu

INTERACTIVE ELECTION MAPS

image/svg+xml
  • All Articles
  • Newsclick Articles
  • All Videos
  • Newsclick Videos
  • हिन्दी
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Science
  • Culture
  • India
  • Sports
  • International
  • Africa
  • Latin America
  • Palestine
  • Nepal
  • Pakistan
  • Sri Lanka
  • US
  • West Asia
About us
Subscribe
Follow us Facebook - Newsclick Twitter - Newsclick RSS - Newsclick
close menu
×
For latest updates on nCOVID-19 around the world visit our INTERACTIVE COVID MAP
sports
India

Both BCCI and NADA Under Pressure As Indian Cricket Adopts Anti Doping Measures | On the Ball

India’s National Anti Doping Agency (NADA) can collect samples of all cricketers during domestic tournaments run by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) as well as the Indian Premier League (IPL). It doesn’t have the authority to collect samples during bilateral series or global events in India, unless the World Anti Doping Agency (WADA) instructs.
R Kaushik
10 Aug 2019
NADA to dope test cricketers during all domestic tournaments run by the BCCI

The Board of Control for Cricket in India’s (BCCI’s) reluctance to toe the World Anti Doping Agency (WADA) line also owes its origins to the misgivings of superstars of another era when it came to the ‘whereabouts’ clause.

The carefully constructed and meticulously erected edifice of autonomy behind which the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has cocooned itself for so long is gradually coming crashing down. It is not so much a spectacular implosion as a steady erosion, the latest blow coming in the form of being arm-twisted to adhere to the dope-testing ambit of the National Anti-Doping Agency (NADA).

A wise man told me long back that managing perceptions is as important as, if not more significant than, projecting reality. Only time, hopefully, will throw illuminating light on the Prithvi Shaw saga, a classic example of botched mismanagement on various fronts with a young, if somewhat truant, star-in-the-making finding his fledgling career at a crossroads. But the manner in which the India opener’s failed drug test has been handled, marked by attendant twists and turns that would shame a Hollywood potboiler, has left much to be desired and provided the perfect cannon fodder that has allowed the sports secretary to step in and land sucker punches.

Also Read | Prithvi Shaw Ban Puts Spotlight on the Farcical BCCI Anti-Doping Protocols

This really isn’t a great time for Indian sport, on so many different levels. The backdoor entry, if you like, of MC Mary Kom to boxing’s World Championships is a blot on a process that is supposed to nurture and encourage talent rather than kowtow to an illustrious past and a legendary career. Nikhat Zareen, the young challenger, might well have been put in her place during the selection trials for the 51kg class, but we will never know now, will we? 

While it is imperative to respect lineage, reverence of the kind bestowed on Mary, and wrestler Sushil Kumar in the lead-up to the Rio Olympics, by precluding trials that might put their participation in global events in jeopardy is an anachronistic concept that has no place in modern professional sport. 

Throw in the whispered boycott calls of the 2022 Commonwealth Games in Birmingham, where shooting – one of India’s brightest hopes for multiple medals of various hues – has been dropped from the programme, and a less than hazy picture of a sense of entitlement of them versus us begins to emerge. 

It is this sense of entitlement on which the BCCI has ridden piggyback for so long, fortified by the presence in its core mix of seasoned and powerful political figures as well as strong-willed administrators who fought tooth and nail to maintain a semblance of reasonable independence stemming from their non-reliance on grants and funds from the government/sports ministry.

Also Read | Dodgy Star and Missing Bouts: Déjà vu for Indian Boxing as Mary Kom Avoids Nikhat Zareen

The dilution of the image of the BCCI in the wake of the betting scandal in the Indian Premier League (IPL) in 2013, and the subsequent purge that has triggered multifarious changes including the erosion of powers of elected office-bearers, has thrown up a massive question mark over the functioning of the country’s richest sporting body. 

The appointment of a Committee of Administrators in January 2017 was greeted with approbation and optimism. But, two and a half years down the line, the said CoA which itself has seen a churn in personnel is no closer to carrying out its brief as it was when it first came into existence. That has led to a lacuna in governance, one of the reasons why the BCCI finds itself disadvantaged both within, and without, such as in its dealings with the International Cricket Council (ICC) which too has been emboldened enough to resort to strong-arm tactics.

Back to BCCI. And NADA. For a long, long time now, the Indian board has steadfastly repelled approaches to fall under the purview of the country’s authorized anti-doping unit. It has instead relied on a customised mechanism that involved collection of samples by the Sweden-based body, International Dope Testing Management, and subsequent tests conducted by the National Dope Testing Laboratory. At global events such as the World Cup and the Champions Trophy, players were subjected to random but mandatory drug tests by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), whose code the ICC adheres by. The BCCI’s distrust of NADA stemmed from a perceived lack of reliability when it came to the testing process – the quality of dope-testing kits, the competence of the pathologists and the quality of sample-collection methods.

Their reluctance to toe the WADA line also owes its origins to the misgivings of superstars of another era when it came to the ‘whereabouts’ clause. The clause necessitates every athlete to undertake a declaration specifying where they could be found for an hour every day for the succeeding three months when out of competition to facilitate sample collection as and when. Players such as Sachin Tendulkar, among others, maintained that ‘whereabouts’ was a breach of privacy and could trigger safety and security issues. It was only after it was convinced that these fears were genuine – some might say paranoid – that the BCCI backed its players’ stance unequivocally, steadfastly warding off any and all advances to the contrary.

Video | India's World Cup Squad, FIFA's Response to I-League Clubs and More (420 Grams, S-1, Ep.40) 

Now, however, with the BCCI shorn of its bargaining chip and with pressure mounting on the governing body to toe the official line or face the risk of ostracisation, the writing was pretty much on the wall even before Rahul Johri, the BCCI CEO, signed on the dotted line on Friday. There were subtle ‘messages’ from the ICC, desperate to break back into the Olympic fold but not in a position to do so until all its constituent members became WADA-compliant. There were not-so-subtle threats from the sports ministry, and especially from the sports secretary, who drew tenuous links between visits of foreign teams to our shores and the BCCI’s adherence to the NADA code.

Pushed to the wall, the BCCI eventually gave in after making token challenges. Under the rules as they exist, NADA can collect samples of all cricketers during domestic tournaments, including age-group events, as well as during the IPL, which is classed as a domestic competition run by the BCCI. It doesn’t, however, have the authority to collect samples on its own accord during bilateral series or global events in India, and can only do so if the WADA instructs the ICC to that effect.

As inadvertently as his partaking of the cough syrup which contained banned substance terbutaline and therefore invited a nine-month suspension, Shaw has played his part in the BCCI sliding under the authority of the NADA. The sports secretary and the national anti-doping body might view it as a victory of sorts, but NADA will have to be on its best behaviour. Its track record has been anything but exemplary, as has been well-chronicled. Now, having got its way, it will be under intense scrutiny and tremendous pressure to maintain high standards. After all, it isn’t without reason that they say, ‘Be careful what you wish for, for it might come true’.

(Kaushik is a veteran cricket writer who has reported on over 100 Tests. He co-authored VVS Laxman's autobiography '281 and Beyond')

Read more sports stories from Newsclick

Get the latest reports & analysis with people's perspective on Protests, movements & deep analytical videos, discussions of the current affairs in your Telegram app. Subscribe to NewsClick's Telegram channel & get Real-Time updates on stories, as they get published on our website.
BCCI
doping in cricket
cricket doping
BCCI anti doping rules
BCCI anti doping protocol
World Anti Doping Agency
Wada
NADA
National Anti Doping Agency
Indian cricket
Indian cricket team
Indian Premier League
Prithvi Shaw
prithvi shaw doping
Prithvi Shaw ban
IPL
On the Ball
Cricket in Olympics
Cricket in Commonwealth Games
BCCI Nada testing
Cricket nada dope testing
Cricket dope testing
Rahul Johri
BCCI CoA
Sachin Tendulkar
WADA whereabouts clause
Related Stories
Kane Williamson and Virat Kohli: The ICC World Test Championship final

Power Shift, What Power Shift? This is Just a Casual Venue Shift

IPL 2021 schedule

IPL 2021 Schedule: Bubble Breach Headache and Neutral Venue Blues

Indian cricket team skipper Virat Kohli

Virat Kohli's Binary World View a Real Test for Cricket

Narendra Modi Stadium at Motera, Ahmedabad

The Name Game: Concrete Advertising or Advertising Via Concrete?

Former India cricketer Wasim Jaffer

Wasim Jaffer’s Treatment Marks a Frightening New Communalisation of the Cricket Field

Virat Kohli during India vs England first Test

The Boys Played Well on Twitter; In Chennai, Not So Much

Virat Kohli on farmers' protest

Cut, Copy, Waste: Indian Sports’s Social Media Has Been Co-Opted To Serve A Nationalist Agenda

australia vs india bio bubble controversy

Let's Talk: Notes on and from Bio-Bubbles

Sourav Ganguly heat attack

BCCI President Sourav Ganguly Suffers Heart Attack, Undergoes Angioplasty

VK

Why is Paternity Leave a Low Priority in Cricket?

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare via EmailShare on RedditShare on KindlePrint
Share

Related Stories

Newsclick Sports

Ahmedabad to Host 2021 ICC T20 World Cup Final: Report

17 April 2021
Nine cities have been chosen by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (ICC) as hosts for the 2021 ICC T20 W
PTI

Heath Streak Ban: Cricket Anti Corruption Units Face New Challenge From Bitcoins

16 April 2021
Former Zimbabwe captain Heath Streak's shocking admission of cricket corruption has also shone a light on crypt
Newsclick Sports

BCCI Keen on IPL 2021 Games in Mumbai Despite Covid-19 Surge in City: Report

03 April 2021
Unlike the 2020 edition, held in limited venues in the UAE with players not moving in and out of the biosecure

Pagination

  • Next page ››

More

  • COVID Surge: SC Stays HC Order Directing UP Govt to Impose Strict Curbs in 5 Cities

    COVID Surge: SC Stays HC Order Directing UP Govt to Impose Strict Curbs in 5 Cities

  • COVID-19: HC Asks MP Govt to Ensure Supply of Life-Saving Drugs in One Hour

    COVID-19: HC Asks MP Govt to Ensure Supply of Life-Saving Drugs in One Hour

  • Unregistered hospitals allowed to function as Covid hospitals, Patna HC questions move

    Unregistered Hospitals Allowed to Function as Covid Hospitals, Patna HC Questions Move

  • Covid-19: Telangana HC gives state gov't 48 hrs to submit plan to control movement in public places

    Covid-19: Telangana HC Gives State Gov't 48 hrs to Submit Plan to Control Movement in Public Places

  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with
about